Keywords
discrimination
generation Z
human resource management
statistical analysis
How to Cite
Abstract
The article covers the issue of how disability is perceived by Generation Z workers entering the labour market. Our research reveals how people with disabilities are perceived by future Generation Z co-workers. The risk of discriminatory behaviour emerging was examined, which may consequently lead to pathologies in human resource management within companies. Statistical methods were used in the study, and recommendations for employers were included in the final part of the work.
References
Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Daryl, J. B., Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1999). Pszichológia. Osiris tankönyvek.
Balázs-Földi, E. (2019). Connections between sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes towards employees with disabilities. Különleges Bánásmód, 5(1), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.18458/KB.2019.1.7
Ballo, J. G. (2023). Is the disability wage gap a gendered inequality? Evidence from a 13-year full population study from Norway. Social Science & Medicine, 331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116077
Banach, I. (2016). Społeczny kontekst edukacji w procesie kształtowania postaw wobec osób niepełnosprawnych. Relacje. Studia z nauk społecznych, Zielona Góra University Press, 1, 25-36.
Banach, I. (2017). Edukacja w oswajaniu z tematyką niepełnosprawności. Instytut Pedagogiki Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego. https://doi.org/10.34616/22.19.210
Bauman, Z. (1963). Zarys socjologii: zagadnienia i pojęcia. Polish Scientific Publishers PWN.
Beatty, J. E., Baldridge, C. D., Boehm, S. A., Kulkarni, M., Colella, A. J. (2018). On the treatment of persons with disabilities in organizations: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management, 58(2), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21940
Beatty, J. E., Kirby, S. L. (2006). Beyond the Legal Environment: How Stigma Influences Invisible Identity Groups in the Workplace. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 18, 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-005-9003-6
Breuillot, A., Bocquet, R., Favre-Bonté, V. (2024). Diversity management and firms’ internationalization: Evidence from French SMEs. International Business Review, 102276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102276
Chan, F., McMahon, B. T., Cheing, G., Rosenthal, D. A., Bezyak, J. (2005). Drivers of workplace discrimination against people with disabilities: the utility of Attribution Theory. Work, 25(1), 77-88.
Chodkowska, M. (2015). Zmiana społeczna jako kategoria analizy postaw wobec problemów niepełnosprawności. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio J – Paedagogia-Psychologia, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.17951/j.2015.28.1.15
Ditta, G. (2020). Internationalization and Human Resource Management: Having intercultural understanding in the ages of globalization. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 22, 30-40. https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2020.22.03
Dwertmann, D. J. G., Boehm, S. A. (2015). Status Matters: The Asymmetric Effects of Supervisor–Subordinate Disability Incongruence and Climate for Inclusion. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0093
Gabrielova, K., Buchko, A. A. (2021). Here comes Generation Z: Millennials as managers. Business Horizons, 64(4), 489-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.013
Goh, E., Okumus, F. (2020). Avoiding the hospitality workforce bubble: Strategies to attract and retain generation Z talent in the hospitality workforce. Tourism Management Perspectives, 33, 100603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.100603
Huszár, Z., Várnagy, P., Zádori, I., Nemeskéri, Z., Pankász, B. (2018). Tolerancia és érzékenység: Társadalmi és kulturális sokszínűség a közép-kelet-európai V4 országokban. Tudásmenedzsment, 19(1), 42-51.
Kagan, M., Lissitsa, S. (2023). Generations X, Y, Z: Attitudes toward social workers in the age of media technologies. Technology in Society, 75, 102353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102353
Kanar, M. (2021). Postawy studentów wobec osób z niepełnosprawnością ruchową oraz osób z niepełnosprawnością intelektualną. Ogrody Nauk i Sztuk, 11, 127-138.
Klinksiek, I. D., Jammaers, E., Taskin, L. (2023). A framework for disability in the new ways of working. Human Resource Management Review, 33(2), 100954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100954
Kroenke, A. (2015). Pokolenie X, Y, Z w organizacji. Zeszyty Naukowe Organizacja i Zarządzanie PŁ, 61(1202), 91-104.
Malhotra, A. (2021). The Postpandemic Future of Work. Journal of Management, 47(5), 1091-1102. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211000435
Moore, M. E., Konrad, A. M., Yang, Y., Ng, E. S. W., Doherty, A. J. (2011). The vocational well-being of workers with childhood onset of disability: Life satisfaction and perceived workplace discrimination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(3), 681-698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.019
Muster, R. (2020). Pokolenie „Z” na współczesnym rynku pracy w opiniach pracodawców. Humanizacja Pracy, 1, 131-146.
Nowak, K. (2015). Postawy młodzieży wobec osób niepełnosprawnych ruchowo. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio J – Paedagogia-Psychologia, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.17951/j.2015.28.1.67
Omolawal, S. A., Obisesan, T. A. (2019). Disability, Workplace Relations and Social Exclusion of “The People with Special Needs” in Selected Public Organisations in Ibadan, Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.30845/ijhss.v9n8p3
Piłat-Borcuch, M. (2013). Pomiędzy tożsamością osobową a postawą społeczną. Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie PŚ, 65, 317-327.
Sadziak, A., Matczak, D., Wieczorek, M. (2022). Postawy młodzieży wobec osób z niepełnosprawnością w zależności od ich środowiska szkolnego – badanie pilotażowe. Niepełnosprawność – Zagadnienia, Problemy, Rozwiązania, I-II/2022(42-43), 259-279.
Schur, L. A., Ameri, M., Kruse, D. (2020). Telework After COVID: A “Silver Lining” for Workers with Disabilities? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 30, 521-536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09936-5
Sękowski, A., Witkowska, B. (2002). W kierunku typologii uwarunkowań postaw wobec osób niepełnosprawnych. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 5, 129-144.
Shantz, A., Wang, J., Malik, A. (2017). Disability status, individual variable pay, and pay satisfaction: Does relational and institutional trust make a difference?. Human Resource Management, 57(1), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21845
Sillero, A. S., Poisa, M. G., Marques-Sule, E., Ayuso Margañon, R. (2023). Motivations and expectations of generation Z nursing students: A post-pandemic career choice qualitative analysis. Journal of Professional Nursing, 49, 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.09.005
Szluz, B. (2015). Pracownicy niepełnosprawni i pełnosprawni – relacje. Na przykładzie zakładów pracy chronionej. Uniwersytet Papieski Jana Pawła II w Krakowie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.15633/9788374385077.06
Śleboda, R. (2012). Zadowolenie osób niepełnosprawnych z pracy – analiza wybranych aspektów z badań PFRON. Niepełnosprawność – Zagadnienia, Problemy, Rozwiązania, 1(1), 98-109.
Świerkosz-Hołysz, M. (2016). Pokolenie Z wkracza na rynek pracy. Społeczeństwo i Edukacja. Międzynarodowe Studia Humanistyczne, 2(21), 439-447.
TNS OBOP (2010). Zadowolenie osób niepełnosprawnych z pracy. Raport PFRON. https://www.pfron.org.pl/fileadmin/ftp/dokumenty/Badania_i_analizy/Zadowolenie_osob_niepelnosprawnych_z_pracy_raport_2010.pdf
Winiewski, M., Bulska, D. (2019). Stereotype Content as a Collective Memory of Place and Its Past Intergroup Relations. Social Psychological Bulletin, 14(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.v14i2.33471
Zhu, X., Law, K. S., Sun, C. T., Yang, D. (2018). Thriving of employees with disabilities: The roles of job self-efficacy, inclusion, and team-learning climate. Human Resource Management, 58(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21920
All texts published in the journal Humanities and Social Sciences are available in the full version on the website of HSS.
Open Access – CC BY 4.0
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons licence (CC-BY 4.0), including the following fields of exploitation comprising:
1) the right to publish the Work in print in book and digital form and to distribute it in book and digital form, including by displaying, playing, broadcasting, making it publicly available by the Publisher and third parties,
2) the right to record and reproduce all or part of the Work on paper and in the form of a digital record and in any other possible way by the Publisher,
3) the right to enter the Work into computer memory and save the Work in the IT systems of the Publisher and other entities distributing digital content,
4) the right to archive the Work and make copies of the Work on electronic media by the Publisher, without quantitative restrictions,
5) the right to digitise the Work and to perform conversions/transformations of the Work in electronic form into other digital formats by the Publisher and third parties,
6) the right to distribute the Work, including via the Internet or other ICT networks by the Publisher and other third parties, in a way that allows viewing, reading, copying the content of the Work in electronic form, i.e. all elements belonging to it, whereby copying shall be understood as the saving of the Work made available to an interested person on a medium of their choice,
7) the right to store the Work in the database of the Publisher and other entities distributing the Work in any form, as well as its processing in the database of the Publisher and third parties,
8) right to translate and publish the Work in one of the modern languages in any form by the Publisher and third parties.
The full text of the license is available at the following link: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en