RESILIENCE AS A STRATEGIC PILLAR OF COGNITIVE SECURITY
pdf

Keywords

cognitive security
cognitive resilience
social resilience
cognitive vulnerability
disinformation

Abstract

This article explores resilience as a strategic response to the emerging challenges of cognitive warfare, increasingly acknowledged as a critical security threat of the twenty-first century. It argues that resilience should be conceived not merely as a defensive measure, but also as a political and social resource essential to safeguarding cognitive sovereignty. Drawing on a critical review of scholarly literature, NATO and EU strategic documents, as well as selected case studies of cognitive operations, the study identifies key psychological and societal vulnerabilities alongside mechanisms that can reinforce resilience. The practical implications underscore the importance of fostering public awareness, strengthening digital and emotional competences, consolidating institutional frameworks, and deepening international cooperation.

https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2025.hss.50
pdf

References

Allenby, B., Garreau, J. (2017). Weaponized narrative is the new battlespace: And the U.S. is in the unaccustomed position of being seriously behind its adversaries. In B. Allenby,

J. Garreau (Eds.), Weaponized narrative: The new battlespace (pp. 5-9). Center on the Future of War, Arizona State University – New America.

Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422

Benkler, Y., Faris, R., Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001

Brcic, M. (2025). The memory wars: AI memory, network effects, and the geopolitics of cognitive sovereignty. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05867

Buckingham, D. (2007). Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the Internet. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2007.2.1.43

Buzan, B., Hansen, L. (2009). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817762

Chesney, R., Citron, D. K. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107(6), 1753-1820. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38RV0D15J

Chiesa, A., Calati, R., Serretti, A. (2011). Does mindfulness training improve cognitive abilities? A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 449-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.003

Claverie, B., du Cluzel, F. (2021a). The cognitive warfare concept. NATO Innovation Hub. https://www.innovationhub-act.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/CognitiveWarfare.pdf

Claverie, B., du Cluzel, F. (2021b). “Cognitive warfare”: The advent of the concept of “cognitics” in the field of warfare. In B. Claverie, B. Prébot, N. Buchler, F. du Cluzel (Eds.), Cognitive warfare. First NATO scientific meeting on cognitive warfare, Bordeaux (France), 21 June 2021 (pp. 6-13). NATO Collaboration Support Office / Science & Technology Organization. https://hal.science/hal-03635898

Cole, A., Le Guyader, H. (2020). Cognitive: A 6th domain of operations? NATO Allied Command Transformation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344469989_Cognitive_A_6th_Domain_of_Operations

Etter, D. M. (2002). Cognitive readiness: An important research focus for national security. In M. C. Roco, W. S. Bainbridge (Eds.), Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science (pp. 330–342). National Science Foundation. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA421613

EU DisinfoLab. (2020, April 11). We fight disinformation because we fight for democracy. https://www.disinfo.eu/we-fight-disinformation-because-we-fight-for-democracy/

Freedom House. (2017). Populists and autocrats: The dual threat to global democracy. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2017/populists-and-autocrats-dual-threat-global-democracy

Gadacz, T. (2024). Myślenie krytyczne. PWN.

Garmezy, N. (1971). Vulnerability research and the issue of primary prevention. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 41(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1971.tb01111.x

Goldstein, E. B. (2014). Cognitive psychology: Connecting mind, research, and everyday experience (4th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Gregory, R. L. (1997). Eye and brain: The psychology of seeing (5th ed.). Princeton University Press.

Huang, L., Zhu, Q. (2023). Cognitive security: A system-scientific approach. Springer.

Isaak, J., Hanna, M. J. (2018). User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, and privacy protection. Computer, 51(8), 56-59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3191268

Janowski, J. (2019). Identyfikacja cywilizacji informacyjnej: Technologiczno-ideologiczna destrukcja życia społecznego. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.

Jarmuż, J. (2023). Czy mądrości można się nauczyć? PWN.

Kahneman, D. (2012). Pułapki myślenia: O myśleniu szybkim i wolnym. Media Rodzina.

Kahneman, D., Sibony, O., Sunstein, C. R. (2022). Szum, czyli skąd się biorą błędy w naszych decyzjach. Media Rodzina.

Lavie, N. (2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.004

Le Guyader, H. (2022). Cognitive domain: A sixth domain of operations? In B. Claverie, B. Prébot, N. Buchler, F. du Cluzel (Eds.), Cognitive warfare: The future of cognitive dominance (pp. 1-5). NATO Collaboration Support Office / Science & Technology Organization. https://hal.science/hal-03635898v1

Lerner, J. S., Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008

Loehr, J. E. (1986). Mental toughness training for sports: Achieving athletic excellence. Lexington Books. https://archive.org/details/mentaltoughnesst0000loeh_u0g6

Mack, A., Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. MIT Press. https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/2640/Inattentional-Blindness

Microsoft. (2021). Digital defense report 2021. https://cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/final/en-us/microsoft-brand/documents/FY21-Microsoft-Digital-Defense-Report.pdf

Morelle, M., Julien, C., Marion, D., Jean-Marc, A. (2023, November). Towards a definition of cognitive warfare. In Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Defense. DGA Maîtrise de l’Information, Rennes. https://hal.science/hal-04328461

NATO. (2016). Commitment to enhance resilience: Issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Warsaw, 8–9 July 2016, Warsaw Summit Communiqué. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_133180.htm

NATO. (2021). NATO warfighting capstone concept. Allied Command Transformation. https://www.act.nato.int/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/NWCC-Glossy-18-MAY.pdf

NATO StratCom COE. (2025). Annual report 2025. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. https://stratcomcoe.org

Napoli, P. M. (2019). Social media and the public interest: Media regulation in the disinformation age. Columbia University Press.

Oberauer, K. (2019). Working memory and attention – A conceptual analysis and review. Journal of Cognition, 2(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.58

OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en

OECD. (2022). Building trust and reinforcing democracy: Preparing the ground for government action. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b407f99c-en

Pacek, P. (2022). Informacja i psychologia na wojnie nowej generacji. Rytm.

Pacek, B., Pacek, P. (2023). Psychologia wojny hybrydowej. Rytm.

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.

Paul, C., Matthews, M. (2016). The Russian “firehose of falsehood” propaganda model: Why it might work and options to counter it. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE198.html

Puddington, A., Roylance, T. (2017). Populists and autocrats: The dual threat to global democracy. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2017/populists-and-autocrats-dual-threat-global-democracy

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Simons, D. J., Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1068/p281059

Skrabacz, A., Więckowski, B., Pajka, A. (2025). Wojna kognitywna jako nowy wymiar operacji wielodomenowych – mapowanie i profilowanie obszaru badań za pomocą metod bibliometrycznych. Journal of Modern Science, 1(61), 708–712.

Strycharczyk, D., Clough, P. (2024). Odporność psychiczna: Strategie i narzędzia rozwoju. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.

Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.

Tögel, J. (2023). Kognitive Kriegsführung: Neueste Manipulationstechniken als Waffengattung der NATO. Westend.

van Prooijen, J. W., Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615

Wardle, C., Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making (Report No. DGI(2017)09). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-report-2017/1680764666

Weeks, B. E. (2015). Emotions, partisanship, and misperceptions: How anger and anxiety moderate the effect of partisan bias on susceptibility to political misinformation. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 699-719. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12164

Werner, E. E., Bierman, J. M., French, F. E. (1977). The children of Kauai: A longitudinal study from the prenatal period to age ten. University of Hawaii Press.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Humanities and Social Sciences