REMOTE WORK IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS OF THE MAZOWIECKIE VOIVODESHIP: EXPERIENCES FROM THE FIRST WAVE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Abstrakt

This article describes the results of studies on remote work introduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic in public administration institutions in local government offices. We have synthesized the available literature on remote work, with a focus on identifying factors enabling remote work, and the benefits and risks of implementing such a system. The empirical section diagnoses the transition in public administration to a remote working model and identifies the impediments associated with this process. We have also attempted to formulate specific recommendations to improve the operations of Polish local government offices. Therefore, local authorities can adopt the results of this study to develop operational programs aiming to digitize administrative institutions.

https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2023.hss.04
pdf (English)

Bibliografia

Agostini, L. (2020). Remote Working Advices to Reduce Risks and Boost Productivity, Essential Services Institutions. Access on the internet: www.iasonltd.com.

Al-Ani, B., Horspool, A. Bligh, M.C. (2011). Collaborating with virtual strangers: Towards developing a framework for leadership in distributed teams. “Leadership”, 7.

Al-Shathry, E.A. (2012). Remote work skills. “International Journal of e-Education”, Vol. 2, No. 6.

Arntz, M., Ben-Yahmend, S., Berlingieri, R. (2020). Working from home and COVID-19: The chances and risks for gender gaps. ZEW expert – Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim. Yune.

Avolio, B., Sosik, J., Kahai, S., Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Reexamining Transformations in leadership source and transmission. “The Leadership Quarterly”, 25 (1).

Ayoko, O.B., Konrad, A.M., Boyle, M.V. (2012). Online work: Managing conflict and emotions for performance in virtual teams. “European Management Journal”, 30.

Bailey, D.E., Kurland, N.B. (2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions and lessons for the study of modern work. “Journal of Organizational Behavior”, 23 SpecIssue.

Butler, J.L. (2020). Challenges and Gratitude: A Diary Study of Software Engineers Working from Home During Covid-19 Pandemic, microsoft.com.

Charalampous, M., Grant, Ch.A., Tramontano, C., Michailidis, E. (2018). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach. “European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology”, 28 (1).

Curzi, Y., Pistoresi, B., Fabbri, T. (2020). The Stressful Implications of Remote E-Working: Evidence from Europe. “International Journal of Business and Management”, 15 (7).

Dimitrova, D. (2003). Controlling teleworkers: supervision and flexibility revisited. “New Technology, Work and Employement”, Vol. 18(3).

Driver, E., (2017). Information Workplace Trends 2017. “Forrester Research”.

Greenberg, A., Nilssen, A. (2008). Telepraca – odpowiedź na wyzwania związane z rozproszonym biznesem XXI wieku, Praktyczne metody transformacji struktury organizacji poprzez nowe sposoby pracy. Wainhouse Research, [Access: 15.07.2022]. Access on the internet: LLC www.wainhouse.com.

Grzechy e-administracji (2016). [Access: 15.07.2022]. Access on the internet: http://www.u24pl.

Hinds, P.J., Cramton, C.D. (2014). Situated Coworker Familiarity: How Site Visits Transform Relationships Among Distributed Workers. “Organization Science”, 25 (3).

Illegems, V., Verbeke, A. (2004). Telework: What Does It Mean for Management? “Long Range Planning”, 37(4).

Jonsen, K., Maznevski, M., Davison, S.C. (2012). Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness [In:] Handbook of Research in International Human Resource Management, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. (2005). Do “Global” Teams Need “Global” Leaders? Identifying Leadership Competencies in Multinational Teams [In:] Shapiro, D., Glinow, M.A., Cheng J., eds., Managing Multinational Teams: Global Perspectives. “Advances in International Management”, Vol. 18.

Joshi, A., Lazarova, M.B., Hui, L. (2009). Getting everyone on board: the role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. “Organization Science”, 20(1).

Kahai, S.S., Huang, R., Jestice, R.J. (2012). Interaction effect of leadership and communication media on feedback positivity in virtual teams. “Group and Organizational Management”, 37.

Prasad, K.D.V., Rajesh W. Vaidyab, R.W., Mruthyanjaya Rao Mangipudic (2020). Effect of occupational stress and remote working on psychological well-being of employees: an empirical analysis during covid-19 pandemic concerning information technology industry in Hyderabad. “Indian Journal of Commerce & Management Studies. Educational Research Multimedia & Publications”, India, Vol. 11(2).

Kelley, E. Kelloway, E.K. (2012). Context matters: Testing a Model of Remote Leadership. “Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies”, Vol. 24.

Kelliher, C., Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. “Human Relations”, 63(1).

Kerber, K.W., Buono, A.F. (2004). Leadership challenges in global virtual teams: lessons from the field. “S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal”, 69(4).

Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P.E., Gibson, C.B. (2006). Enhancing the transfer of computer – assisted training proficiency in geographically distributed teams. “Journal of Applied Psychology”, 91(3).

Kirkman, B.L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C.B., Tesluk, P.E., McPherson, S.O. (2019). Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre [Access: 15.07.2022]. Access on the internet: https://ivypanda.com/essays/the-article-overview.

Klitmøller, A. Lauring, J. (2013). When global virtual teams share knowledge: Media richness, cultural difference and language commonality. “Journal of World Business”, 48(3).

Kurland, N.B., Cooper, C.D. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. “Journal of Organizational Behavior”, 23(4).

Małek, D. Kudaj, P. (2017). Dobre praktyki estońskiej e-administracji. Rekomendacje dla Polski. „Rocznik Administracji Publicznej”, Vol. 3.

Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W.J., Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. “Organization Science”, 24 (5).

Maznevski, M.L., Chudoba, K.M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. “Organization Science”, 11.

Möhring, K., Naumann, E., Reifenscheid, M., Wenz, A., Rettig, T., Krieger, U., Friedel, S., Finkel, M., Cornesse, C., Blom, A.G. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and subjective well-being: longitudinal evidence on satisfaction with work and family [Access: 15.07.2022]. Access on the internet: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=reus20.

Nurmi, N. (2011). Coping with coping strategies: how distributed teams and their members deal with the stress of distance, time zones and culture. “Stress and Health”, 27.

Peters, P., Van der Lippe, T. (2007). The Time-Pressure Reducing Potential of Tele-homeworking: The Dutch Case. “The International Journal of Human Resource Management”, 18(3).

Peters, P., Ligthart, P. E.M., Bardoel, A., Poutsma, E. (2016). ’Fit’ for telework’? Cross-cultural variance and task-control explanations in organizations’ formal telework practices. “International Journal of Human Resources Management”, Vol. 27(21).

Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. “Information & Management”, 50.

State of Remote work (2018). [Access: 15.07.2022]. Access on the internet: https://stories.buffer.com/state-of-remote-work-2018-.

Wildman, J.L, Griffith, R.L. (2015). Leading Global Teams: Translating Multidisciplinary Science to Practice. “Springer”, 19, 4.

Zander, L., Mockaitis, A.I., Butler, C.L. (2012). Leading global teams. “Journal of World Business”, 47 (4).