HOW A NATURAL EDUCATION SHOULD ADDRESS ISSUES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS
Full text (PDF)

Keywords

natural education
education content
integrated approach
water security course

How to Cite

1.
Olena Mitrasova, Andrii Mats. HOW A NATURAL EDUCATION SHOULD ADDRESS ISSUES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS. JCEEA [Internet]. 2021Oct.3 [cited 2022Dec.8];38(68):5-15. Available from: https://journals.prz.edu.pl/jceea/article/view/rb.2021.1

Abstract

The purpose of the research is the creation of an effective didactic system through the integrated approach to the content of natural education with a special emphasis on professional orientation. Methods of the analysis, synthesis of knowledge, educational experiment, and mathematical statistics were used for the fulfillment of the purpose. The effective didactic system of interdisciplinary knowledge of  natural-science course, namely the water security course, was created. The educational experiment proved the effectiveness of building the educational content of the training course based on an integrated approach.

https://doi.org/10.7862/rb.2021.1
Full text (PDF)

References

1. Ampatzidis, G., & Ergazaki, M. (2017). Using ecology to enhance everyday reasoning: The case of interdependent and reciprocal causality. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 11(1), 93–104.
2. Ampatzidis, G., & Ergazaki, M. (2017a). Using ecosystem simulation models to teach about the ‘resilient nature.’. In A. Lionarakis, S. Ioakimidou, M. Niari, E. Manousou, T. Hartofylaka, S. Papadimitriou, & A. Apostolidou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference in Open & Distance Learning: The Learning Design, 6(B), 224–231. Athens: Hellenic Open University and Hellenic Network of Open and Distance Education.
3. Ampatzidis, G., & Ergazaki, M. (2018). Can the idea of the ‘balanced nature’ be challenged? Students’ reasoning about disturbed and protected ecosystems after a teaching intervention and one year later. In N. Gericke & M. Grace (Eds.), Challenges in Biology Education Research, 20–36.
4. Bezsonov Ye., Mitryasova, O., Smyrnov, V., Smyrnova S. 2017. Influence of the South-Ukraine electric power producing complex on the ecological condition of the Southern Bug River. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4/10 (88), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.108322.
5. Cheung, A.C.K., Slavin, R.E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45, 283-292, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X1665.
6. Hokayem, H., Ma, J., & Jin, H. (2015). A learning progression for feedback loop reasoning at lower elementary level. Journal of Biological Education, 49(3), 246–260.
7. Hokayem, H., & Gotwals, A. W. (2016). Early elementary students’ understanding of complex ecosystems: A learning progression approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1524–1545.
8. An Integrated Approach to Learning, Teaching & Assessment ( 2017). Dublin, https://www.pdst.ie/sites/default/files/Integrated%20Approach_0.pdf.
9. Kosmutzky, A., Nokkala, T. (2020). Toward a methodology discourse in comparative higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 74(2), 117–123.https://doi.org/10.1111/ /hequ.12257.
10. Little, A.W., Green, A. (2009). Successful globalisation, education and sustainable development. International Journal of Educational Development (Education and Sustainable Development), 29(2), 166–174.
11. Mason, M. (2009). Making educational development and change sustainable: Insights from complexity theory, International Journal of Educational Development (Education and Sustainable Development), 29(2), 117–124.
12. Menashy, F., Verger, A. (2019). Network analysis, education policy, and international development: An introduction. International Journal of Educational Development, 64, 58–61.
13. Ministerial Conference Yerevan. (2015). http://ehea.info/page-ministerial-conference-yerevan-2015.
14. Ministerial Conference Paris. (2018, May). http://ehea.info/page-ministerial-conference-paris-2018.
15. Mitryasova, O., Pohrebennyk, V., Kochanek, A., Stepanova, O. (2017). Environmental Footprint Enterprise as Indicator of Balance it’s Activity. Conference Proceedings «17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference SGEM 2017», Albena, Bulgaria, 29 June – 5 July 2017, 51 (17), 371–378.
16. Mitryasova, O., Pohrebennyk, V. (2017). The Status of the Small River as an Indicator of the Water Security of Natural Surface Water. Conference Proceedings «17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2017», Vienna, Austria, 27 November – 29 November 2017. 33(17), 391–398.
17. Mitryasova, O. (2020). An Integrated Approach to Education Content. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 30–38.
18. Mitryasova, O., Pohrebennyk, V. (2020) Hydrochemical Indicators of Water System Analysis as Factors of the Environmental Quality State. In: Królczyk G., Wzorek M., Król A., Kochan O., Su J., Kacprzyk J. (eds) Sustainable Production: Novel Trends in Energy, Environment and Material Systems. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, Springer, Cham. 198, 91−104. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11274-5_7.
19. Mitryasova, O., Koszelnik, P., Gruca-Rokosz, R., Smyrnov, V, Smyrnova, S., Bezsonov, Ye., Zdeb, M., Ziembowicz, S. (2020). Features of Heavy Metals Accumulation in Bottom Sediments of the Southern Bug Hydroecosystem. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 21(3), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/118299.
20. Munawaroh, (2017). The Influence of Teaching Methods and Learning Environment to the Student’s Learning Achievement of Craft and Entrepreneurship Subjects at Vocational High School. International journal of environmental & Science education, 12, 665–678.
21. Nesgovorova, N. & Savinykh, V. (2009). An Integrative Approach to Environmental Education. Philosophy of Education, 1, 192–199.
22. Pawley, A.L.(2019) “Asking questions, we walk”: How should engineering education address equity, the climate crisis, and its own moral infrastructure? Journal of Engineering Education, 108 (4), 447–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20295.
23. Ridei, N., Rybalko, Y. & Kycherenko Y. (2013). The role of ecological culture as an indicator of sustainable development of relations between society and nature. European Scientific Journal, 2, 14−23.
24. Rome Ministerial Communiqué. (2020, November 19). https://ehea2020rome.it/storage/uploads/5d29d1cd-4616-4dfe-a2af-29140a02ec09/ /BFUG_Final_Draft_Rome_Communique-link.pdf.
25. Sovhira, S. & Dushechkina, N. (2018). Methodological Approaches to Pupils’ Ecological Culture Education. Journal of Landscape Ecology (Czech Republic), 11(1), 61–72.
26. Stensaker, B., Fumasoli, T. (2017). Multi-level strategies in universities: Coordination, contestation or creolisation? Higher Education Quarterly, 71(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12126.