An airspace model aplicable for automatic flight route planning inside free route airspace
PDF

Keywords

transport
navigation
air transport
flight planning
flight safety

How to Cite

Drupka, G., Majka, A., Rogalski, T., & Trela, L. (2018). An airspace model aplicable for automatic flight route planning inside free route airspace. Advances in Mechanical and Materials Engineering, 35(298 (1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.7862/rm.2018.01

Abstract

The article is strongly related to the Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) project. The project’s objective is the improvement of air transport above Europe 0. Since Air Traffic Management (ATM) is involved to obtain more effective approach to air traffic flow managing activities, the concept of Flexible Use Airspace (FUA) has arisen in result. ATM is a quite developed aviation’s subdomain, therefore currently existing airspace state has been described briefly in the article, referring to the presented solution concept. The notion of Free Route Airspace (FRA) airspace model defined in this article relies on mathematical description. The selected approach clarifies airspace as a set of squares or cubes that have volumes with appointed values due to certain conditions in the considered time (i.e. traffic flow or weather). The model has to ensure facilitation of flight route planning and warrant aircrafts separation towards flight safety assurance. The concept assumes that this airspace model will provide assistance for airspace user to select essential flight plan criteria, such as economy, time, etc. The path will be appointed according to personal preferences, based on the model from which further elaborated algorithm will evaluate situation. The presented solution is a response to air traffic growth. Therefore it supports the SESAR project through research and development activities. The description proves that airspace model would create enhancement in flight planning for airspace users.

https://doi.org/10.7862/rm.2018.01
PDF

References

1. Baumgartner M., Finger M.: The Single European Sky gridlock: A difficult 10 year reform process, Utilities Policy, 31 (2014) 289-301.
2. Das D., Sharma S., Parti R., Singh J.: Analyzing the effect of aviation infrastructure over aviation fuel consumption reduction, J. Air Transport Manag., 57 (2016) 89-100.
3. Kopecki G., Pęczkowski M., Rogalski T.: Przykładowy algorytm automatycznego wyznaczania trasy przelotu w przestrzeni lotów swobodnych, Autobusy, 18 (2017) 1219-1224.
4. Schaefer D., Castelli L., Cook A.: Long-term and innovative research in ATM, J. Air Transport Manag., 56 (2016) 2016.06.002.
5. Tomczyk G., Rogalski T., Bakunowicz J.: Koncepcja przygotowania i koordynacji planów lotów IFR w obszarze lotów swobodnych, Autobusy, 17 (2016) 707-713.
6. Sergeeva M., Delahaye D., Mancel C., Vidosavljevic A.: Dynamic airspace configuration by genetic algorithm, J. Traffic Transp. Eng., 4 (2017) 300-314.
7. SESAR2020. Solutions for the Future Air Traffic Management System, Brussels 2017.
8. SESAR Joint Undertaking, European ATM Master Plan. Executive View, Luxembourg 2015.
9. Steen M.: Graph Theory and Complex Networks: An Introduction, ISBN 978-90-815406-1-2, Paperback, 2010.
10. Trudeau R.: Introduction to Graph Theory, Dover Publications Inc., New York 1996.