Keywords
arthroplasty
finite element method
stress-strain state
intact femur
hip transplant
stress shielding
finite element method
stress-strain state
intact femur
hip transplant
stress shielding
How to Cite
Vinakurava, A., & Skrzat, A. (2016). Biomechanical properties of hip implant with ceramics coating. Advances in Mechanical and Materials Engineering, 33(293 (1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.7862/rm.2016.6
Abstract
In this paper the results of investigations of biomechanical properties of transplantation of hip bone with ceramic coating are presented. The finite element analysis of the stress-strain state of the femur bone after hip replacement surgery and full recovery period are carried out. A finite element model of the femur bone is obtained on the basis of tomographic data of 36 years old male patient. A transplant stem with ceramic coating based on A400 lateralized specification was analyzed. Stresses in the intact femur and femur after arthroplasty were determined. The effect of the reduction of bone density as the result of removal of normal stresses by an implant were analyzed. The study serves as a biomechanical basis for development of artificial prostheses and for clinical hip joint replacements.
References
1. Ridzwan M.I.Z., Shuib S., Hassan A.Y., Shokri A.A., Mohamad Ibrahim M.N.: Problem of stress shielding and improvement to the hip implant designs: A Review – J. Medical Sci., 7 (2007) 460-467.
2. Herrera A., Mateo J, Gil-Albarova J., Lobo-Escolar A., Ibarz E., Gabarre S., Más Y., Gracia L.: Cementless Hydroxyapatite Coated Hip Prostheses, BioMed Research Int., 2015 (2015) Article ID 386461, 13 pages.
3. Nikitsin A.V., Mikhasev G.I., Maslov A.P: Finite element analysis of the porous coating in hip-joint prosthesis, Int. Sci. Tech. J. "Mechanics of Machines, Mechanisms and Materials", 18 (2012) 86-89.
4. Mohammed R.A.: Interface micromotion of cementless hip stems in simulated hip arthroplasty, American J. Appl. Sci., 6 (2009) 1682-1689.
5. Tonino A.J., Therin M., Doyle: Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. Histology and histomorphometry around five components retrieved at post mortem, J. Bone Joint Surgery, 81 (1999) 148-154.
6. Alexander R.: Animals mechanics, Singwick & Jackson, London 1968.
7. Fonseca E.M.M., Lima M.J., Barreirra L.M.S.: Human femur assessment using isotropic and orthotropic materials dependent of bone density, 3rd Int, Conf, on Integrity, Reliability and Failure, Porto 2009, pp.7-8.
8. Orlovskii V. P., Komlev V. S., Barinov S. M.: Hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-based ceramics, Inorganic Materials, 38 (2002) 973-984.
9. Huiskes R., Rietbergen B.: Preclinical testing of total hip stems. The effects of coating placement, Clinical Orthopaedics Related Res., 319 (1995) 64-76.
10. Rosenthall L., Bobyn J.D., Tanzer M.: Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatitecoating on regional adaptive bone remodelling, Int. Orthopaedics, 23 (1999) 325-329.
11. Nakashima Y., Sato T., Yamamoto T. : Results at aminimum of 10 years of follow-up for AMS and PerFix HA-coated cementless total hip arthroplasty: impact of cross-linkedpolyethylene on implant longevity, J. Orthopaedic Sci., 18 (2013) 962-968.
12. Park Y.S., Lee J.Y., Yun S.H., Jung M.W., Oh I.: Comparison of hydroxyapatite- and porous-coated stems in total hip replacement, Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 74 (2003) 259-263.
13. Tas A.C., Ozgur E.: Manufacture of macroporous calcium hydroxyapatite bioceramics, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 19 (1999) 2569-2772.
14. Yosibash Z.: A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in vitro experiments, J. Biomech., 129 (2007), 297-309.
15. Bergmann G: Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities, J. Biomech., 34 (2001) 859-871.
16. Bojescul J.A.: Results of porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty without cement at fifteen years: a concise follow-up of a previous report, The J. Bone and Joint Surgery, 85 (2003) 1079-1083.
17. Duchemin L.: Prediction of mechanical properties of cortical bone by quantitative computed tomography, Medical Eng. Physics, 30 (2008) 21-328.
18. Simões J.A., Vaz M.A., Blatcher S., Taylor M.: Influence of head constrain and muscle forces on the strain distribution within the intact femur, Medical Eng. Physics, 22 (2000) 453-459.
2. Herrera A., Mateo J, Gil-Albarova J., Lobo-Escolar A., Ibarz E., Gabarre S., Más Y., Gracia L.: Cementless Hydroxyapatite Coated Hip Prostheses, BioMed Research Int., 2015 (2015) Article ID 386461, 13 pages.
3. Nikitsin A.V., Mikhasev G.I., Maslov A.P: Finite element analysis of the porous coating in hip-joint prosthesis, Int. Sci. Tech. J. "Mechanics of Machines, Mechanisms and Materials", 18 (2012) 86-89.
4. Mohammed R.A.: Interface micromotion of cementless hip stems in simulated hip arthroplasty, American J. Appl. Sci., 6 (2009) 1682-1689.
5. Tonino A.J., Therin M., Doyle: Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems. Histology and histomorphometry around five components retrieved at post mortem, J. Bone Joint Surgery, 81 (1999) 148-154.
6. Alexander R.: Animals mechanics, Singwick & Jackson, London 1968.
7. Fonseca E.M.M., Lima M.J., Barreirra L.M.S.: Human femur assessment using isotropic and orthotropic materials dependent of bone density, 3rd Int, Conf, on Integrity, Reliability and Failure, Porto 2009, pp.7-8.
8. Orlovskii V. P., Komlev V. S., Barinov S. M.: Hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-based ceramics, Inorganic Materials, 38 (2002) 973-984.
9. Huiskes R., Rietbergen B.: Preclinical testing of total hip stems. The effects of coating placement, Clinical Orthopaedics Related Res., 319 (1995) 64-76.
10. Rosenthall L., Bobyn J.D., Tanzer M.: Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatitecoating on regional adaptive bone remodelling, Int. Orthopaedics, 23 (1999) 325-329.
11. Nakashima Y., Sato T., Yamamoto T. : Results at aminimum of 10 years of follow-up for AMS and PerFix HA-coated cementless total hip arthroplasty: impact of cross-linkedpolyethylene on implant longevity, J. Orthopaedic Sci., 18 (2013) 962-968.
12. Park Y.S., Lee J.Y., Yun S.H., Jung M.W., Oh I.: Comparison of hydroxyapatite- and porous-coated stems in total hip replacement, Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 74 (2003) 259-263.
13. Tas A.C., Ozgur E.: Manufacture of macroporous calcium hydroxyapatite bioceramics, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 19 (1999) 2569-2772.
14. Yosibash Z.: A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in vitro experiments, J. Biomech., 129 (2007), 297-309.
15. Bergmann G: Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities, J. Biomech., 34 (2001) 859-871.
16. Bojescul J.A.: Results of porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty without cement at fifteen years: a concise follow-up of a previous report, The J. Bone and Joint Surgery, 85 (2003) 1079-1083.
17. Duchemin L.: Prediction of mechanical properties of cortical bone by quantitative computed tomography, Medical Eng. Physics, 30 (2008) 21-328.
18. Simões J.A., Vaz M.A., Blatcher S., Taylor M.: Influence of head constrain and muscle forces on the strain distribution within the intact femur, Medical Eng. Physics, 22 (2000) 453-459.