Keywords
sustainable development
production and consumption
hierarchical linear modeling
SDG
management
European Union
How to Cite
Abstract
Production and consumption are both monitored in the context of progress toward a circular economy and sustainable development. In each case, the number and types of the implemented indicators are different. Thus, it is reasonable to ask about the comparability of information produced by two composite measures for equivalent research subjects: production and consumption. This is a thematic area of the EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy, as well as for responsible consumption and production, which is the 12th goal of the UN Agenda 2030. To scrutinize this problem in the European Union, this research aims to test statistically the similarity between the production and consumption composite indicators (based on Circular Economy Action Plan measures), and the responsible consumption and production composite indicators (based on the UN Agenda 2030 measures). The thesis that the application of the composite indicators generates significantly different results is not proved.
References
Banse, G. (2014). Nachhaltige Entwicklung und Kultur – Anregungen zur Diskussion. “Humanities and Social Sciences”, XIX (21 (3/2014)).
Bartoszczuk, P. (2021). Eco-innovation in the context of the circular economy [In:] Wyrwa, D., Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M., Ziółkowski, B., Jankowska-Mihułowicz, M., eds., Gospodarka o obiegu zamkniętym (p. 25–34). Rzeszów: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej.
Boozer, M., Ranis, G., Stewart, F., Suri, T. (2004). Paths to Success: The Relationship Between Human Development and Economic Growth. “World Development”, 39. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.08.020.
Borys, T. (2005). Wskaźniki zrównoważonego rozwoju. Warszawa–Białystok: Wydawnictwo Ekonomia i Środowisko.
—— (2011). Zrównoważony rozwój – jak rozpoznać ład zintegrowany. “Problemy Ekorozwoju”, 6(2).
Burchard-Dziubińska, M. (2010). Rozwój instytucji na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju [In:] Burchard-Dziubińska, M., Rzeńca, A., eds., Zrównoważony rozwój na poziomie lokalnym i regionalnym, teoria i praktyka (p. 81–105). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy – Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf.
European Commission (2018). Measuring progress towards circular economy in the European Union – Key indicators for a monitoring framework. Commission staff working document SWD(2018) 17 final. Accompanying the document communication from the commission to the european parliament, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions on a monitoring framework for the circular economy {COM(2018) 29 final}. Access on the internet: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=SWD:2018:17:FIN.
Fidlerova, H., Stareček, A., Vraňaková, N., Bulut, C., Keaney, M. (2022). Sustainable Entrepreneurship for Business Opportunity Recognition: Analysis of an Awareness Questionnaire among Organisations. “Energies”, 15. DOI: 10.3390/en15030849.
Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M., Bełch, P., Siwiec, D., Bednarova, L., Pacana, A. (2022). Instruments used to improve the betterment of products quality. “Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series”. DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2022.157.10.
Kayo, C., Tojo, S., Iwaoka, M., Matsumoto, T. (2014). Evaluation of Biomass Production and Utilization Systems [In:] Tojo, S., Hirasawa, T., eds., Research Approaches to Sustainable Biomass Systems. “Academic Press”. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-404609-2.00014-3.
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. “Resources, Conservation and Recycling”, 127. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.
Le Caous, E., Huarng, F. (2020). Economic Complexity and the Mediating Effects of Income Inequality: Reaching Sustainable Development in Developing Countries. “Sustainability", 12(5), 2089. DOI: 10.3390/su12052089.
Lebel, L., Lorek, S. (2010). Production – Consumption Systems and the Pursuit of Sustainability [In:] Lebel, L., Lorek, S., Daniel, R., eds., Sustainable Production Consumption Systems: Knowledge, Engagement and Practice (p. 1–12). Springer Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3090-0_1.
Liedtke, C., Bienge, K., Wiesen, K., Teubler, J., Greiff, K., Lettenmeier, M., Rohn, H. (2014). Resource Use in the Production and Consumption System – The MIPS Approach. “Journal Resources”, 3. DOI: 10.3390/resources3030544.
Manickam, P., Duraisamy, G. (2019). 3Rs and circular economy. "Circular Economy in Textiles and Apparel”. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102630-4.00004-2.
Markard, J., Raven, R., Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. “Research Policy”, 41(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
Marrucci, L., Daddi, T., Iraldo, F. (2019). The integration of circular economy with sustainable consumption and production tools: Systematic review and future research agenda. "Journal of Cleaner Production”, 240, UNSP 118268. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro. 2019.118268.
Matusiak, B E., Matejun, M., Różańska-Bińczyk, I. (2020). Koncepcja zrównoważonego rozwoju jako środowisko implementacji praktyk green HR we współczesnych przedsiębiorstwach [In:] Urbaniak, M., Tomaszewski, A., eds., Wyzwania społeczne i technologiczne a nowe trendy w zarządzaniu współczesnymi organizacjami (p. 111–124). Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., Mathieux, F., Blengini, G., Alaerts, L., Van Acker, K., De Meester, S., Dewulf, J. (2019). Circular economy indicators: What do they measure? “Resources Conservation and Recycling”, 146. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045.
Mustafa, G., Rizov, M., Kernohan, D. (2017). Growth, human development, and trade: The Asian experience. "Economic Modelling", 61. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.12.007.
Sariatli, F. (2017). Linear economy versus circular economy: A comparative and analyzer study for optimization of economy for sustainability. “Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development”, 6. DOI: 10.1515/vjbsd-2017-0005.
Schröder, P., Antonarakis, A., Brauer, J., Conteh, A., Kohsaka, R., Uchiyama, Y., Pacheco, P. (2019). SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production – Potential Benefits and Impacts on Forests and Livelihoods. DOI: 10.1017/9781108765015.014.
Shah, S. (2016). Determinants of human development index: A cross-country empirical analysis. “International Journal of Economics and Management Studies”, 3. DOI:10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V3I5P106.
Szczygieł, E. (2021). Circular economy – a new concept or a necessity. “Sprawy Międzynarodowe”, 74(3). DOI: 10.35757/sm.2021.74.3.12
Szczygiel, E., Kowalska, K. (2021). Meeting halfway – Understanding circular behaviours among households as a starting point for business practices. “European Research Studies Journal”, XXIV(3B).
Tsalis, T.A., Malamateniou, K.E., Koulouriotis, D., Nikolaou, I.E. (2020). New challenges for corporate sustainability reporting: United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for sustainable development and the sustainable development goals. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management”, 27(4). DOI: 10.1002/csr.1910.
United Nations, General Assembly (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Annex: Our Common Future, Forty-second session. Item 83 (e) of the provisional agenda, A/42/427. Development and international economic co-operation: Environment.
—— (1992). Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (Annex I, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I)).
—— (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 201 (A/RES/70/1).
Yazan, D.M., Cafagna, D., Fraccascia, L., Mes, M., Pontrandolfo, P., Zijm, H. (2018). Economic sustainability of biogas production from animal manure: A regional circular economy model. “Management Research Review”, 41(5). DOI: 10.1108/MRR-02-2018-0053.
Ziółkowski, B. (2012). Ewolucyjne podejście do ekoinnowacji i zrównoważonego rozwoju – ujęcie systemowe. Rzeszów: Poligrafia Wyższego Seminarium Duchownego w Rzeszowie.
—— (2013). „Europa 2020” w zarządzaniu zrównoważonym rozwojem Unii Europejskiej. “Humanities and Social Sciences”, XVIII (20 (1/2013)).
—— (2014). Sustainability – culture interface in the social, environmental and economic perspective. “Humanities and Social Sciences”, XIX (21 (3/2014)).
—— (2021). Introduction [In:] Ziółkowski, B., Agarski, B., Sebo, J., eds., Innovations in circular economy – Environmental labels and declarations (p. 9–13). Rzeszów: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej.
—— (2021). Challenges for Circular Economy Strategies in Polish Enterprises during the Pandemic Crisis. “European Research Studies Journal”, XXIV(4B). DOI: 10.35808/ersj/2780.
Ziółkowski, B., Wyrwa, D. (2021). The model of circular economy [In:] Ziółkowski B., Agarski B., Juraj, S., eds., Innovations in circular economy – Environmental labels and declarations (p. 14–30). Rzeszów: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej.
All texts published in the journal Humanities and Social Sciences are available in the full version on the website of HSS.
Open Access – CC BY 4.0
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons licence (CC-BY 4.0), including the following fields of exploitation comprising:
1) the right to publish the Work in print in book and digital form and to distribute it in book and digital form, including by displaying, playing, broadcasting, making it publicly available by the Publisher and third parties,
2) the right to record and reproduce all or part of the Work on paper and in the form of a digital record and in any other possible way by the Publisher,
3) the right to enter the Work into computer memory and save the Work in the IT systems of the Publisher and other entities distributing digital content,
4) the right to archive the Work and make copies of the Work on electronic media by the Publisher, without quantitative restrictions,
5) the right to digitise the Work and to perform conversions/transformations of the Work in electronic form into other digital formats by the Publisher and third parties,
6) the right to distribute the Work, including via the Internet or other ICT networks by the Publisher and other third parties, in a way that allows viewing, reading, copying the content of the Work in electronic form, i.e. all elements belonging to it, whereby copying shall be understood as the saving of the Work made available to an interested person on a medium of their choice,
7) the right to store the Work in the database of the Publisher and other entities distributing the Work in any form, as well as its processing in the database of the Publisher and third parties,
8) right to translate and publish the Work in one of the modern languages in any form by the Publisher and third parties.
The full text of the license is available at the following link: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en