RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES IN THEIR SOCIOECONOMIC CONTEXT: PROSPECTS FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE GLOBAL ENERGY LANDSCAPE, A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS
HSS-okładka-30-2023-04 - part I
pdf

Keywords

bibliometric
renewable energy
CiteSpace

How to Cite

KUT, P., PIETRUCHA-URBANIK, K., ZELEŇÁKOVÁ, M., & HLAVÍNEK, P. (2023). RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES IN THEIR SOCIOECONOMIC CONTEXT: PROSPECTS FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE GLOBAL ENERGY LANDSCAPE, A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Humanities and Social Sciences, 30(4 - part 1), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2023.hss.47

Abstract

Focusing on renewable energy sources (RES), this article examines their comprehensive impact on society and the economy. This publication goes beyond traditional approaches by introducing bibliometric analysis using CiteSpace. By identifying key research trends in the scientific literature, it contributes to a better understanding of areas of research interest in the field of renewable energy. Bibliometric analysis serves to systematize knowledge and identify the main research trends – a valuable contribution to the development of this important field of science. As a research tool, it highlights the dynamics and evolution of the field of renewable energy research; this can support the further development of this important branch of science and serve as a platform for identifying potential areas for further research and practical activities. Through a detailed analysis of trends in the scientific literature, the article contributes to a deeper understanding of areas of interest in the field of renewable energy. The results are a valuable starting point for future scientific research and practical initiatives, supporting the development of this key field.

https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2023.hss.47
pdf

References

Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Yang, X., Hussain, N., Sinha, A. (2022). Financial development and environmental degradation: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? “Gondwana Researchˮ, 105. DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2021.09.012.

Ahn, K., Chu, Z., Lee, D. (2021). Effects of renewable energy use in the energy mix on social welfare. “Energy Economicsˮ, 96. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105174.

Akella, A.K., Saini, R.P., Sharma, M.P. (2009). Social, economical and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems. “Renewable Energyˮ, 34(2). DOI: 10.1016/j.renene. 2008.05.002.

Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. “Research Policyˮ, 37(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003.

Boubaker, S., Omri, A. (2022). How does renewable energy contribute to the growth versus environment debate? “Resources Policyˮ, 79. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103045.

Carley, S. (2009). State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness. “Energy Policyˮ, 37(8). DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.062.

Chen, C. (2018). Visualizing and Exploring Scientific Literature with CiteSpace: An Introduction. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction&Retrieval – CHIIR’18. DOI: 10.1145/3176349.3176897.

Chou, C.-H., Ngo, S.L., Tran, P.P. (2023). Renewable Energy Integration for Sustainable Economic Growth: Insights and Challenges via Bibliometric Analysis. “Sustainabilityˮ, 15(20). Article 20. DOI: 10.3390/su152015030.

Ding, X., Yang, Z. (2022). Knowledge mapping of platform research: A visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. “Electronic Commerce Researchˮ, 22(3). DOI: 10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7

Eagle, L., Osmond, A., McCarthy, B., Low, D., Lesbirel, H. (2017). Social Marketing Strategies for Renewable Energy Transitions. “Australasian Marketing Journalˮ, 25(2). DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.04.006.

Edmondson, D.L., Kern, F., Rogge, K.S. (2019). The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions. “Research Policyˮ, 48(10). DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.010.

Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. “Research Policyˮ, 40(5). DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005.

Fraser, T., Chapman, A.J., Shigetomi, Y. (2023). Leapfrogging or lagging? Drivers of social equity from renewable energy transitions globally. “Energy Research & Social Scienceˮ, 986. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103006.

Gagnon, J.P. (2013). Development by synergising renewable energy with social services. “International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Developmentˮ, 7(4). DOI: 10.1504/IJISD.2013.057039.

García-Lillo, F., Sánchez-García, E., Marco-Lajara, B., Seva-Larrosa, P. (2023). Renewable Energies and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Overview. “Energiesˮ, 16(3). Article 3. DOI: 10.3390/en16031211.

Gozgor, G., Mahalik, M.K., Demir, E., Padhan, H. (2020). The impact of economic globalization on renewable energy in the OECD countries. “Energy Policyˮ, 139. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111365.

Hossain, M.S., Madlool, N.A., Rahim, N.A., Selvaraj, J., Pandey, A.K., Khan, A.F. (2016). Role of smart grid in renewable energy: An overview. “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviewsˮ, 60. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.098.

Jenniches, S. (2018). Assessing the regional economic impacts of renewable energy sources – A literature review. “Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviewsˮ, 93. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.008.

Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., Popp, D. (2010). Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts. “Environmental and Resource Economicsˮ, 45(1). DOI: 10.1007/s10640-009-9309-1.

Kaygusuz, A., Keles, C., Alagoz, B.B., Karabiber, A. (2013). Renewable energy integration for smart sites. “Energy and Buildingsˮ, 64. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.031.

Kerr, S., Watts, L., Colton, J., Conway, F., Hull, A., Johnson, K., Jude, S., Kannen, A., MacDougall, S., McLachlan, C., Potts, T., Vergunst, J. (2014). Establishing an agenda for social studies research in marine renewable energy. “Energy Policyˮ, 67. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.063.

Knuth, S., Behrsin, I., Levenda, A., McCarthy, J. (2022). New political ecologies of renewable energy. “Environment and Planning E: Nature and Spaceˮ, 5(3). DOI: 10.1177/

Kut, P., Pietrucha-Urbanik, K. (2022). Most Searched Topics in the Scientific Literature on Failures in Photovoltaic Installations. “Energiesˮ, 15(21). DOI: 10.3390/en15218108.

Lee, T. (2021). Financial investment for the development of renewable energy capacity. “Energy & Environmentˮ, 32(6). DOI: 10.1177/0958305X19882403.

Liu, W., Shen, Y., Razzaq, A. (2023). How renewable energy investment, environmental regulations, and financial development derive renewable energy transition: Evidence from G7 countries. “Renewable Energyˮ, 206. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.017.

Mathews, A.P. (2014). Renewable Energy Technologies: Panacea for World Energy Security and Climate Change? “Procedia Computer Scienceˮ, 32. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.483.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G. & PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. “BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)ˮ, 339. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2535.

Sengupta, S., Sahay, A., Hisrich, R.D. (2020). The social – market convergence in a renewable energy social enterprise. “Journal of Cleaner Productionˮ, 270. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122516.

Su, C.-W., Khan, K., Umar, M., Chang, T. (2022). Renewable energy in prism of technological innovation and economic uncertainty. “Renewable Energyˮ, 189. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.110.

Tan, K.M., Babu, T.S., Ramachandaramurthy, V.K., Kasinathan, P., Solanki, S.G., Raveendran, S.K. (2021). Empowering smart grid: A comprehensive review of energy storage technology and application with renewable energy integration. “Journal of Energy Storageˮ, 39. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.102591.

Tiwari, A.K., Aikins Abakah, E.J., Gabauer, D., Dwumfour, R.A. (2022). Dynamic spillover effects among green bond, renewable energy stocks and carbon markets during COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for hedging and investments strategies. “Global Finance Journalˮ, 51. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100692.

Unruh, G.C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. “Energy Policyˮ, 28(12). DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7.

Uzar, U. (2020). Political economy of renewable energy: Does institutional quality make a difference in renewable energy consumption? “Renewable Energyˮ, 155. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.172.

Wan, B., Wan, W., Hanif, N., Ahmed, Z. (2022). Logistics performance and environmental sustainability: Do green innovation, renewable energy, and economic globalization matter? “Frontiers in Environmental Scienceˮ, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.996341.

Wang, W., Melnyk, L., Kubatko, O., Kovalov, B., Hens, L. (2023). Economic and Technological Efficiency of Renewable Energy Technologies Implementation. “Sustainabilityˮ, 15(11), Article 11. DOI: 10.3390/su15118802.

Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., Bürer, M.J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. “Energy Policyˮ, 35(5). DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.

Yasin, I., Ahmad, N., Chaudhary, M.A. (2020). Catechizing the Environmental-Impression of Urbanization, Financial Development, and Political Institutions: A Circumstance of Ecological Footprints in 110 Developed and Less-Developed Countries. “Social Indicators Researchˮ, 147(2). DOI: 10.1007/s11205-019-02163-3.

Zafirakis, D.P. (2010). Overview of energy storage technologies for renewable energy systems [In:] Stand-Alone and Hybrid Wind Energy Systems (p. 29–80). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1533/9781845699628.1.29.

Zhao, J., Shahbaz, M., Dong, X., Dong, K. (2021). How does financial risk affect global CO2 emissions? The role of technological innovation. “Technological Forecasting and Social Changeˮ, 168. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120751.

Zhao, X., Zhao, J. (2023). Digital finance and inequality in renewable energy technology innovation. “Energy & Environmentˮ, 0958305X231171352. DOI: 10.1177/0958305X231171352.

All texts published in the journal Humanities and Social Sciences are available in the full version on the website of HSS.

Open Access – CC BY 4.0

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons licence (CC-BY 4.0), including the following fields of exploitation comprising:

1) the right to publish the Work in print in book and digital form and to distribute it in book and digital form, including by displaying, playing, broadcasting, making it publicly available by the Publisher and third parties,

2) the right to record and reproduce all or part of the Work on paper and in the form of a digital record and in any other possible way by the Publisher,

3) the right to enter the Work into computer memory and save the Work in the IT systems of the Publisher and other entities distributing digital content,

4) the right to archive the Work and make copies of the Work on electronic media by the Publisher, without quantitative restrictions,

5) the right to digitise the Work and to perform conversions/transformations of the Work in electronic form into other digital formats by the Publisher and third parties,

6) the right to distribute the Work, including via the Internet or other ICT networks by the Publisher and other third parties, in a way that allows viewing, reading, copying the content of the Work in electronic form, i.e. all elements belonging to it, whereby copying shall be understood as the saving of the Work made available to an interested person on a medium of their choice,

7) the right to store the Work in the database of the Publisher and other entities distributing the Work in any form, as well as its processing in the database of the Publisher and third parties,

8) right to translate and publish the Work in one of the modern languages in any form by the Publisher and third parties.

The full text of the license is available at the following link: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en