Abstract
This article attempts to scientifically examine issues related to the safety of a minor participating in family mediation. The main part aims to present the benefits of a minor’s participation in mediation, and to analyze the arguments against this. The study also aims to assess whether Polish regulations regarding family mediation are appropriate and sufficient for adequate protection of the safety and rights of minors in mediation proceedings. Is it necessary and justified for a minor to participate in mediation proceedings to end a family dispute? When making decisions in this regard, not only is the age of the minor important, but also the fact that minors, due to their physical, mental, emotional, and intellectual immaturity, require special protection and treatment. For this reason, the article also describes the role the mediator should play in guaranteeing the minor’s rights, while satisfying their need for security in the family.
References
Czayka-Chełmińska, K., Glegoła-Szczap, M. (2009). On the specificity of family mediation. A few reflections on the legal solutions regulating the use of mediation in Poland [In:] Mazowiecka, L., ed., Mediation. Kraków: Wolters Kluwer.
Fiałkowski, A. (2017). Human security against contemporary threats. European Institute of Security [Access: 1.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://mil.link/instytut/bezpieczenstwo-czlowieka-wobec-wspolczesnych-zagrozen/.
Gójska, A., Huryn, V. (2007). Mediation in resolving family conflicts. Warsaw: C.H. Beck.
Gudowski, J. (2021). Civil Code. Comment. Vol. I. General part [Access: 1.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://sip.lex.pl/#/commentary/587851408/648848/gudowski-jacek-red-kodeks-cywilny-komentarz-tom-i-czesc-ogolna-cz-1-art-1-55-4?cm=URELATIONS.
Helios, J., Jedlecka, W. (2019). Diagnosis and protection of a child with developmental trauma in the Polish legal system. Warsaw: Difin.
Jaros, P. (2015). Definition of a child [In:] Stadniczeńko, S.L., ed., Convention on the Rights of the Child. Selection of issues (articles and comments). Warsaw.
Kaszczyszyn, R. (2015). Mediation and mediators in the Polish legal system [In:] Mazowiecka, L., ed., EU standards of restorative justice programs. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
Kaźmierczak, M., Kaźmierczak, J. (2015). Family Mediation. A practical guide. Warsaw: Difin.
Księżak, P. [In:] Civil Code. Comment. General part, ed. M. Pyziak-Szafnicka, commentary on art. 10 k.c., 2014, [Access: 1.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://sip.lex.pl/#/commentary/587250094/170623/ksiezak-pawel-red-pyziak-szafnicka-malgorzata-red-kodeks-cywilny-komentarz-czesc-ogolna-wyd-ii?cm=URELATIONS.
Nordhelle, G. (2010). Mediation. The Art of Conflict Resolution. Gdańsk: FISO.
Przybyła-Basista, H. (2006). Family mediation in a divorce conflict. Readiness and resistance of spouses and the effectiveness of the mediation process. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
Purc-Kurowicka, K. (2019). Conflict management through mediation – opportunities and barriers to mediation. “Scientific Journals of the University of Rzeszów”, Law Series 25.
Purc-Kurowicka, K. (2020). E-mediation as a modern dispute resolution technology [In:] Pomykała, M., Merkwa, M., ed., New technologies – contemporary challenges in the area of law and security. Rzeszów: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej.
Rychły-Lipińska, A. (2017). The model of individual security in a contemporary changing environment – preliminary considerations. “Security Studies”, No. 2.
Seroka, M. (2014). The position of the Ombudsman for Children on mediation [In:] Rakoczy, T., ed., The future of mediation in the Polish legal system. Lublin: KUL.
Serwach, M. [In:] Civil Code. Comment. General part, ed. M. Pyziak-Szafnicka, commentary on Art. 10 k.c. 2014 [Access: 1.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://sip.lex.pl/#/commentary/587886129/683569/balwicka-szczyrba-malgorzata-red-sylwestrzak-anna-red-kodeks-cywilny-komentarz?cm=URELATIONS.
Sitarz, O., Bek, D. (2014). Mediation with the participation of a minor – victimological issues. “Archives of Criminology”, Vol. XXXVI.
Święcicka, D. (2021). Minor witness in a criminal trial. “Palestra”, 11.
Tryboń, M., Grabowska-Lepczak, I., Kwiatkowski, M. (2011). Human security in the face of 21st century threat.s „Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP”, nr 41
Wilejczyk, M. (2013). The Civil Law Meaning of Forgiveness. “Legal Studies”, No. 1.
Wożniak, S. (2018). The concept of individual security in international relations [Access: 1.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://depotuw.ceon.pl/bitstream/handle/item/2951/Streczenia_rozpraw_doktorskiej.pdf?sequence=2.
Wybrańczyk, D. (2022). Legal situation of a minor child of divorcing parents, Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
LEGAL ACTS
Human Development Report from 1994 [Access: 1.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-1994.
Civil Code of April 23, 1964, Journal Laws of 2022, 1360, i.e.
Code of Civil Procedure, of November 17, 1964. Journal of Laws 2021, 1805, i.e.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Gdańsk of January 20, 2016, V ACa 607/15, LEX No. 2052629.
All texts published in the journal Humanities and Social Sciences are available in the full version on the website of HSS.
Open Access – CC BY 4.0
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons licence (CC-BY 4.0), including the following fields of exploitation comprising:
1) the right to publish the Work in print in book and digital form and to distribute it in book and digital form, including by displaying, playing, broadcasting, making it publicly available by the Publisher and third parties,
2) the right to record and reproduce all or part of the Work on paper and in the form of a digital record and in any other possible way by the Publisher,
3) the right to enter the Work into computer memory and save the Work in the IT systems of the Publisher and other entities distributing digital content,
4) the right to archive the Work and make copies of the Work on electronic media by the Publisher, without quantitative restrictions,
5) the right to digitise the Work and to perform conversions/transformations of the Work in electronic form into other digital formats by the Publisher and third parties,
6) the right to distribute the Work, including via the Internet or other ICT networks by the Publisher and other third parties, in a way that allows viewing, reading, copying the content of the Work in electronic form, i.e. all elements belonging to it, whereby copying shall be understood as the saving of the Work made available to an interested person on a medium of their choice,
7) the right to store the Work in the database of the Publisher and other entities distributing the Work in any form, as well as its processing in the database of the Publisher and third parties,
8) right to translate and publish the Work in one of the modern languages in any form by the Publisher and third parties.
The full text of the license is available at the following link: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en

