Keywords
fraud risk
methods of control
remote work
occupational fraud
How to Cite
Abstract
The main problem addressed in this article is the identification of occupational fraud risks in remote work, and their impact on control solutions implemented by managers. The article is based on desk research (including the analysis of available reports and their findings) and structured interviews with managers and experts. In addition to the systematization of occupational frauds during remote work, and methods of controlling fraud, the main result is the identification of key variables that managers should take into account when minimizing occupational fraud. These include the level (and form) of control, levels of job satisfaction and trust, and the skills of employees and managers. This project, therefore, also poses terminological challenges related to the definitions of occupational fraud and counter productive work behavior, and further identification of the phenomenon of fictitious human capital. These may be relevant from the perspective of further research on the problem of management and effectiveness of remote work.
References
AlGhamdi, S., Win, K.T., Vlahu-Gjorgievska, E. (2022). Employees’ intentions toward complying with information security controls in Saudi Arabia’s public organisations. “Government Information Quarterly”, Vol. 39, No. 4.
Amo, L.C., Cichocki, D. (2019). Disgruntled yet Deft with IT: Employees who Pose Information Security Risk. “Proceedings of the 2019 on Computers and People Research Conference”. New York, NY, USA: ACM.
Andrew, O. (2010). Why Controlling Bosses Have Unproductive Employees. [Access: 17.03. 2023]. Access on the internet: https://hbr.org/2010/05/why-controlling-bosses-have-un.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (n.d.). What is fraud? [Access: 3.03.2019]. Access on the internet: https://www.acfe.com/fraud-101.aspx.
Baka, Ł. (2017). Zachowania kontrproduktywne w pracy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Balkhi, F., Nasir, A., Zehra, A., Riaz, R. (2020). Psychological and Behavioral Response to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. “Cureus”, Vol. 12, No. 5.
Cadigan, S., Card, D., Will, K. (2021). 2021 Survey on Industry Trends in HR Technology and Service Delivery [Access: 3.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://isg-one.com/advisory/hr-technology-and-transformation/2021-industry-trends-in-hr-technology-and-service-delivery.
Cyfert, S., Krzakiewicz, K. (2020). Podstawy zarządzania organizacjami. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
Drela, K. (2022). Professional burnout of Polish employees in enterprises during the Covid-19 pandemic. “Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series”, Vol. 164.
Hayes, S.W., Priestley, J.L., Moore, B.A., Ray, H.E. (2021). Perceived Stress, Work-Related Burnout, and Working from Home Before and During COVID-19: An Examination of Workers in the United States. “SAGE Open”, Vol. 11, No. 4.
HR trends 2023: Melding humanity and hybrid work to retain top talent (2022, October 24). The Future of Commerce [Access: 23.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://www.the-future-of-commerce.com/2022/10/24/hr-trends-2023/.
Huang, S.Y., Lin, C.-C., Chiu, A.-A., Yen, D.C. (2017). Fraud detection using fraud triangle risk factors. “Information Systems Frontiers”, Vol. 19, No. 6.
Johnston, A.C., Warkentin, M., McBride, M., Carter, L. (2016). Dispositional and situational factors: influences on information security policy violations. “European Journal of Information Systems”, Vol. 25, No. 3.
Kot, P. (2021). View of Psychosocial Aspects of Employee Control with the Use of Modern Technologies. “Journal for Perspectives of Economic Political and Social Integration”, Vol. 26.
KPMG. (2020). The Future of HR in the New Reality. It’s time to start playing the long game [Access: 23.02.2023]. Access on the internet: https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2020/10/the-future-of-hr-in-the-new-reality.html.
Krugielka, A., Kostrzewa-Demczuk, P. (2021). Motivating, Caring for Employee Development and Employer Branding in Diverse Companies during the Covid-19 Pandemic. “European Research Studies Journal”, Vol. XXIV (Special Issue 5).
Liu, C., Yang, J., Liu, J., Zhu, L. (2018). The effect of abusive supervision on employee deviant behaviors: an identity-based perspective. “The International Journal of Human Resource Management”, Vol. 32, No. 4.
Lloyd, J. (2015). Overcontrol kills: Managers need to let go [Access: 17.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://biztimes.com/overcontrol-kills-managers-need-to-let-go/.
Łukasik-Stachowiak, K. (2022). Organizational Culture in Remote Working Conditions – Home Office. “Humanities and Social Sciences quarterly”, Vol. 29, No. 4.
Maciejewska, R. (2016). Employee Anomie in the Organization. “Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska”, Vol. 41, No. 2.
Manroop, L., Petrovski, D. (2022). Exploring layers of context-related work-from-home demands during COVID-19. “Personnel Review”.
Marciniak, J. (2015). Audyt i controlling funkcji personalnej w przedsiębiorstwie. Warszawa: Oficyna a Wolters Kluwer business.
Maulidi, A., Ansell, J. (2022). Corruption as distinct crime: the need to reconceptualise internal control on controlling bureaucratic occupational fraud. “Journal of Financial Crime”, Vol. 29, No. 2.
PwC. (2020). When everyone can work from home, what’s the office for? [Access: 1.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://www.pwc.com/us/en/library/covid-19/assets/pwc-return-to-work-survey.pdf.
Raddatz, N.I., Marett, K., Trinkle, B.S. (2020). The Impact of Awareness of Being Monitored on Computer Usage Policy Compliance: An Agency View. “Journal of Information Systems”, Vol. 34, No. 1.
Rasic Jelavic, S., Glamuzina, M. (2021). Study on the Types of Deviant Workplace Behavior in Croatian IT Companies Study on Types of Deviant Work. “The Journal of Organizational Management Studies”, Vol. 2021.
Raźniewski, K., Fierla-Jakubowicz, J., Oleksiuk, M. (2021). Organizacja pracy w czasie pandemii. Wyzwania dla HR w 2021 roku. EY [Access: 1.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://www.ey.com/pl_pl/workforce/raport-hr-organizacja-pracy-w-czasie-pandemii.
Robinson, S.L., Benett, R.J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviours: a multidimensional scaling study. “Academy of Management Journal”, Vol. 38, No. 2.
Sahadev, S., Purani, K., Kumar Panda, T. (2013). Service employee adaptiveness Exploring the impact of role-stress and managerial control approaches [Access: 17.03.2023]. Access on the internet: www.emeraldinsight.com/0142-5455.htm.
Sulaiman, N.S., Fauzi, M.A., Wider, W., Rajadurai, J., Hussain, S., Harun, S.A. (2022). Cyber–Information Security Compliance and Violation Behaviour in Organisations: A Systematic Review. “Social Sciences”, Vol. 11, No. 9.
Szejniuk, A. (2018). Kontrola, controlling czy audyt. Istota i znaczenie w zarządzaniu organizacją. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
Tajvar, A., Hosseini, Z., Fakherpour, A. (2021). Explaining the Challenges of Coping with Coronavirus Crisis in the Workplaces: A Qualitative Study. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1187068/v1.
Volini, E., Schwartz, J., Denny, B., Mallon, D., Van Durme, Y., Hauptman, M., Yan, R. et al. (2020). Returning to work in the future of work. Embracing purpose, potential, perspective, and possibility during COVID-19. Global Human Capital Trends. Special report. Deloitte [Access: 4.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/cn/Documents/human-capital/deloitte-cn-hc-special-report-returning-to-work-in-the-future-of-work-en-200527.pdf.
Westfall, B. (2022, March 3). Friends at Work? Today’s Employees Aren’t Interested. Capterra survey [Access: 22.03.2023]. Access on the internet: https://www.capterra.com/resources/friends-at-work-research/.
Yang, E., Kim, Y., Hong, S. (2023). Does working from home work? Experience of working from home and the value of hybrid workplace post-COVID-19. “Journal of Corporate Real Estate”, Vol. 25, No. 1.
All texts published in the journal Humanities and Social Sciences are available in the full version on the website of HSS.
Open Access – CC BY 4.0
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons licence (CC-BY 4.0), including the following fields of exploitation comprising:
1) the right to publish the Work in print in book and digital form and to distribute it in book and digital form, including by displaying, playing, broadcasting, making it publicly available by the Publisher and third parties,
2) the right to record and reproduce all or part of the Work on paper and in the form of a digital record and in any other possible way by the Publisher,
3) the right to enter the Work into computer memory and save the Work in the IT systems of the Publisher and other entities distributing digital content,
4) the right to archive the Work and make copies of the Work on electronic media by the Publisher, without quantitative restrictions,
5) the right to digitise the Work and to perform conversions/transformations of the Work in electronic form into other digital formats by the Publisher and third parties,
6) the right to distribute the Work, including via the Internet or other ICT networks by the Publisher and other third parties, in a way that allows viewing, reading, copying the content of the Work in electronic form, i.e. all elements belonging to it, whereby copying shall be understood as the saving of the Work made available to an interested person on a medium of their choice,
7) the right to store the Work in the database of the Publisher and other entities distributing the Work in any form, as well as its processing in the database of the Publisher and third parties,
8) right to translate and publish the Work in one of the modern languages in any form by the Publisher and third parties.
The full text of the license is available at the following link: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en