Keywords
critical theory
East-Central Europe
transformation
EU enlargement
neoliberal capitalism
Abstract
This paper claims that the assessment of the eastern EU enlargement depends on the adopted theoretical perspective. The practitioners of critical approaches in sociology claim that mainstream approaches to European integration suffer from neglect. Critical thinkers provide an alternative account of European integration claiming that it can be conceptualized as enforcement mechanism for the spread of neoliberal capitalism. The eastern EU enlargement should be analyzed on the basis of world-systems theory and post-colonial theory. From this point of view, the post-communist political, social and economic transformations based on the neoliberal economic theory have produced mixed results. Specifically, economic neoliberalism is a flawed economic theory that demonstrated its weakness in the post-2008 period. Transnational capital exploited EU spaces to force a neoliberal agenda on the candidate states by way of conditionality. Narrow sectoral interests took precedence over economic rationality and social policy goals. Hence, the relative failure of post-communist transformations in such domains as: EU cohesion policy, unstable democracies, or demography undermining future economic growth prospects. Moreover, the multidimensional crisis initiated by forcing the neoliberal agenda on the candidate states has initiated adverse social and political developments on EU-wide scale in such domains as anti- immigration backlash and the ascendancy of far-right political parties.
References
Ådnanes, M. (2007). Social Transitions and Anomie among Post-Communist Bulgarian Youth.“Young”, 15(1).
Baylis, T.A. (2007). Embattled Executives: Prime Ministerial Weakness in East Central Europe. “Communist and Post-Communist Studies”, 40(1).
Behr, H., Stivachtis, Y.A. (2016). European Union: An empire in new clothes? [In:] Behr, H., Stivachtis, Y.A., eds., “Revisiting the European Union as Empire”. London–New York: Routledge.
Berend, I.T., Bugaric, B. (2015). Unfinished Europe: Transition from Communism to Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. “Journal of Contemporary History”, 50(4).
Boje, T.P., Steenbergen, B., Walby, S. (2007). Introduction [In:] Boje, T.P., Steenbergen, B., Walby, S., eds., European Societies: Fusion Or Fission?. London – New York: Routledge.
Böröcz, J. Sarkar, M. (2005). What is the EU? International Sociology, 20(2).
Böröcz, J., Smith, D.A. (1995). Introduction: Late Twentieth Century Challenges for World-System Analysis [In:] Böröcz, J., Smith, D.A., eds, New World Order?: Global Transformations in the Late Twentieth Century. Westport: Praeger.
Böröcz, J. (2016). An Incapacity to See Ourselves as Part of the Whole World, and the Insistence to See Ourselves as Part of Europe, LeftEast, December 14. Access on the internet: https://www.criticatac.ro/lefteast/jozsef-borocz-interview-2016/ (Accessed 12.12.2019).
Brochmann, G., Erik, J., Jurado E. (2013). Introduction: Immigration, Work and Welfare: Towards an integrated approach [In:] Brochmann, G., Jurado, E., eds., Europe's Immigration Challenge: Reconciling Work, Welfare and Mobility. London–New York: I.B. Tauris & Co.
Burchill, S., Linklater, A. (2005). Introduction [In:] Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Paterson, M., Reus-Smit, C., True, J., eds., Theories of International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cafruny, A., Ryner, M. (2019). Alternative Perspectives on European Integration [In:] Jessop, B., Overbeek, H., eds., Transnational Capital and Class Fractions: The Amsterdam School Perspective Reconsidered. Abingdon: Routledge.
Casi, L., Resmini, L. (2012). Globalization, Foreign Direct Investments and Growth in European Regions, an Empirical Assessment [In:] Capello, R., Ponce Dentinho, T., eds., Globalization Trends and Regional Development: Dynamics of FDI and Human Capital Flows. Northampton: Edvard Elgar Publishing.
Covacs, M., Kabachnik, P. (2001). Shedding Light on the Quantitative Order: the EU’s Discourse in the Commission Opinions of 1997 [In:] Böröcz, J., Covacs, M.J., eds., Empire’s New Clothes: Unveiling EU Enlargement Telford: „Central Europe Review”. Access on the internet: http://aei.pitt.edu/144/1/Empire.pdf (2018, September 15).
Cox, R. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. “Millennium – Journal of International Studies”, 10(2).
Devetak, R., (2005). Critical Theory [In:] Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Paterson, M., Reus-Smit, C., True, J., eds., Theories of International Relations. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Drinkwater, S., Eade, J., Garapich, M. (2009). Poles apart? EU enlargement and the labour market outcomes of immigrants in the United Kingdom. “International Migration” 47(1).
Engel-Di Mauro, S. (2006). The European Union as Empire [In:] Engel-Di Mauro, S., ed., The European's Burden: Global Imperialism in EU Expansion. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
European Quality of Life Survey (2016). Access on the internet: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/surveys/european-quality-of-life-surveys/european-quality-of-life-survey-2016 (2019, December 15).
Eurostat (2019a) Employment statistics, Access on the internet: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Employment_statistics (2019, February 14).
Eurostat (2019b) GDP per capita, consumption per capita and price level indices. Access on the internet: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php?title=GDP_per_capita, _consumption_per_capita_and_price_level_indices (2019, January 28).
Goodwin, M., Milazzo, C. (2015). Britain, the European Union and the Referendum: What drives Euroscepticism? Research report for Chatham House. Access on the internet: https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/20151209Euroscepticis mGoodwinMilazzo.pdf (2019, December 12).
Greskovits, B. (2000). Rival Views of Post-Communist Market Society: The path-dependence of transitology [In:] Dobry, M., ed., Democratic and Capitalist Transitions in Eastern Europe: Lessons for the Social Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Grødeland Å.B., Koshechkina, T.Y. Miller, W.L. (2001). A Culture of Corruption?: Coping with Government in Post-Communist Europe. New York: Central European University Press.
Grzymala-Busse, A., Innes, A. (2003). Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political Competition in East Central Europe. “East European Politics and Societies”, 17(1).
Haahr, J.H., Walters, W., (2006). Governing Europe [In:] Haahr, J.H., Walters, J., eds., Governing Europe: Discourse, Governmentality and European Integration). London: Routledge.
Heyns, B. (2005). Emerging inequalities in Central and Eastern Europe. “Annual Review of Sociology” 31.
Hooper, B., Kramsch, O. (2007). Post-Colonizing Europe: The Geopolitics of Globalization, Empire and Borders: here and there, now and then. “Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie” 98(4).
Humrich, Ch. (2014). Critical theory [In:] Schieder, S., Spindler, M., eds., Theories of International Relations. Abingdon, Routledge.
Jakubek, J. (2008). Polish Experiences with European Policy Coordination 1991–2006 [In:] Cox, T., Myant, M., eds., Reinventing Poland: Economic and Political Transformation and Evolving National Identity. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kornai, J. (2006). The Great Transformation of Central Eastern Europe: Success and Disappointment. “Economics of Transition”, 14(2). DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00252.x (2019, December 12).
Kurki, M. (2011). Governmentality and EU Democracy Promotion: The European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the Construction of Democratic Civil Societies. “International Political Sociology” 5(4).
Kuus, M. (2004). Europe's Eastern Expansion and the Reinscription of Otherness in East-Central Europe. Progress in Human Geography 28(4).
––––– (2006). The Double Enlargement and the Remapping of the East [In:] Engel-Di Mauro, S., ed., The European's Burden: Global Imperialism in EU Expansion. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
Maccartney, H. (2011). Variegated Neoliberalism: EU Varieties of Capitalism and International political economy. London – New York: Routledge.
Mateos, S., Morcillo Laiz, A. (2017). International Relations and Political Sociology [In:] Outhwaite, W., ed., The SAGE Handbook of Political Sociology. London: Sage.
Meardi, G. 2012. Social Failures of EU Enlargement: A case of workers voting with their feet. Abingdon: Routledge.
Neunhöffer, G., Plehwe, D., Walpen, B. (2006). Introduction: Reconsidering Neoliberal Hegemony [In:] Neunhöffer, G., Plehwe, D., Walpen, B., eds., Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique. Abingdon: Routledge.
Ost, D. (2006). The Defeat of Solidarity: Anger and Politics in Postcommunist Europe. Ithaka: Cornell University Press.
Ostrachshenko, V., Popova, O. (2014). Life (Dis)satisfaction and the Intention to Migrate:Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. “The Journal of Socio-Economics” 48(1).
Pijl, van der, K. (2014). The Discipline of Western Supremacy: Modes of Foreign Relations and Political Economy. London: Pluto Press.
Rumford, Ch. (2008). Cosmopolitan Spaces: Europe, Globalization, Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
Schimmelfenning, F. Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by Conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4).
Shlapentokh, V., Vanderpool, C.K., (1999). Introduction [In:] Doktorov, B.Z., Shlapentokh, V., Vanderpool, C.K., eds., The New Elite in Post-communist Eastern Europe. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Silbey, S. (2005). After Legal Consciousness. “The Annual Review of Law and Social Science” 1.
Staniszkis, J. (2009). Antropologia władzy. Między Traktatem Lizbońskim a kryzysem Warszawa, Prószyński i S-ka.
Sztompka, P. (2000). The Ambivalence of Social Change: Triumph or Trauma? “Polish Sociological Review”, 131(3).
United Nations Development Programme (2011) Average annual population growth rate (%). Access on the internet: https://data.undp.org/dataset/Average-annual-population-growth-rate-/gjtv-43ai (2019, January 14).
Vachudova, M.A. (2009). Corruption and Compliance in the EU's PostCommunist Members and Candidates. “JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, Supplement 47.
Vanhuysse, P. (2007). Workers without Power: Agency, legacies, and labor decline in East European varieties of capitalism. “Czech Sociological Review”, 43(3).
Wallerstein, I. (2005). World-systems Analysis: An Introduction. Durham: Duke UniversityPress.
Walters, W. (2004). The Political Rationality of European Integration [In:] Larner, W., Walters,W., eds., Global Governmentality: Governing International Spaces. London: Routledge.
Włoch, R. (2015). Teoria krytyczna [In:] Zięba, R., Bieleń, S., Zając, J., eds., Teorie i podejścia badawcze w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Warszawa: Wydział Dziennikarstwa i Nauk Politycznych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Zybertowicz, A. (2001). Konstruktywizm jako orientacja metodologiczna w badaniach społecznych. „Kultura i Historia”, 2001(1), Access on the internet: http://www.kulturaihistoria.umcs.lublin.pl/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Kultura-i-Historia-nr-1.pdf (2019, December 12).
All texts published in the journal Humanities and Social Sciences are available in the full version on the website of HSS.
Open Access – CC BY 4.0
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons licence (CC-BY 4.0), including the following fields of exploitation comprising:
1) the right to publish the Work in print in book and digital form and to distribute it in book and digital form, including by displaying, playing, broadcasting, making it publicly available by the Publisher and third parties,
2) the right to record and reproduce all or part of the Work on paper and in the form of a digital record and in any other possible way by the Publisher,
3) the right to enter the Work into computer memory and save the Work in the IT systems of the Publisher and other entities distributing digital content,
4) the right to archive the Work and make copies of the Work on electronic media by the Publisher, without quantitative restrictions,
5) the right to digitise the Work and to perform conversions/transformations of the Work in electronic form into other digital formats by the Publisher and third parties,
6) the right to distribute the Work, including via the Internet or other ICT networks by the Publisher and other third parties, in a way that allows viewing, reading, copying the content of the Work in electronic form, i.e. all elements belonging to it, whereby copying shall be understood as the saving of the Work made available to an interested person on a medium of their choice,
7) the right to store the Work in the database of the Publisher and other entities distributing the Work in any form, as well as its processing in the database of the Publisher and third parties,
8) right to translate and publish the Work in one of the modern languages in any form by the Publisher and third parties.
The full text of the license is available at the following link: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en