The problem of unpaid work in household in the context of evolution of contemporary socioeconomic though
HSS-okładka-26-2019-03-inter
PDF

Keywords

household
unpaid work
critical economy
socioeconomic though

How to Cite

Leszczyńska, M. (1). The problem of unpaid work in household in the context of evolution of contemporary socioeconomic though. Humanities and Social Sciences, 26(3), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2019.hss.28

Abstract

The issue of valuation of home work performed in a household in the context of its remuneration raises a lot of controversy. Unpaid work done for a household by members of the society, often in society, is not considered valuable at all. As it appears, however, it is also a kind of limitation of basic human rights regarding remuneration for the work done or the right to rest. The aim of the article is to stimulate reflection on the issue of unpaid work and its role in the contemporary economy, as well as to indicate the directions of changes in the approach of economists in the treatment of unpaid work in households.

https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2019.hss.28
PDF

References

Albelda, R. (2002). Fallacies of Welfare-to-Work Policies [In:] Albelda R., Withorn A., eds., Lost Ground: Welfare Reform, Poverty, and Beyond, Boston: South End Press.

Aslaksen, I., Flaatten, A., Koren, Ch. (1999). Explorations on Economics and Quality of Life. “Feminist Economics”, 5(2).

Beneria, L. (2003). Gender, Development, and Globalization: Economics as if People Mattered. London: Routledge .

Cagatay, N., Elson, D. (2000). The Social Content of Macroeconomic Policies. “World Development”, Vol. 28, No. 7.

Charkiewicz, E., Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz, A. (2009). Feminist Dictionary of Economics Concepts, Online Library of Think Tank Feminist [Access: 8.03.2019]. Access on the Internet: https://rownosc.info/bibliography/publication/feministyczny-slownik-pojec-z-ekonomii; https://rownosc.info/dictionary/ekonomia-feministyczna/.

Compare the causes of undeclared work, its scale, character and social consequences. Final report on research. (2008). Warsaw: CBOS, IPiSS.

Compare Unpaid homework – how to treat it, to effectively form the basis of a caring society? (2006). Report, Łódź: Institute of Civil Affairs.

Dijkstra, A.G., Plantenga, J., ed. (2003). Economics and gender. The occupational position of women in the European Union. Gdańsk: GWP.

Elson, D. (2015). Women's empowerment and environmental sustainability in the context of international UN agreements [In:] Hawley J., Why women will save the planet. London: Zed Books.

Elson, D., Jain, D. (2011). Zbieranie feministycznej wiedzy na potrzeby odbudowy postępów polityki publicznej. Kalifornia, Ottawa: New Delhi Thousand Oaks, Międzynarodowe Centrum Badań Rozwoju SAGE.

Ferber, M., Nelson, J., eds., (1993). Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics. Chicago: University Press.

Gideon, J. (1999). Looking at Economies as Gendered Structures: An Application to Central America. “Feminist Economics”, No. 5(1).

Górnicka-Boratyńska, A., Women's homework – should it be payable?, Interview with A. Titkow and D. Duch-Krzystoszek. “Gazeta Wyborcza”, 23.04.2005.

Haug, F. (2011). Perspective four in one. Manifesto for a more just life. Translator M. Boyer, M. Skóra. Online Library of Think Tank Feminist [Access: 8.03.2019]. Access on the Internet: http://www.ekologiasztuka.pl/pdf/f0107haug.pdf.

Łapniewska, Z. (2017). Ethics of caring and the economy of the future. “Theoretical Practice”, No. 2 (24).

—— (2018). Epistemology of Feminist Economics [In:] Giorgino V., Walsh Z., eds., CoDesigning Economies in Transition. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

—— (2019). Unpaid work of women, Online Library of the Think Tank Femini-stycznia [Access: 20.03.2019]. Access on the Internet: //rownosc.info/bibliography/publication/feministyczny-slownik-pojec-z-ekonomii.

Mikuta, B. (2000). Studies on the value of homework in the city and in the countryside, with particular emphasis on the implementation of the nutritional function, PhD thesis. Warsaw: SGGW.

Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice. “Feminist Economics” 9(2/3).

Power, M. (2004). Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics. “Feminist Economics” 10(3), November.

Pszczółkowska, D. (2019). Male and female homework [Access: 8.03.2019]. Access on the Internet: https://wyborcza.pl.

Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities. “Feminist Economics”, 9 (2/3).

—— (2014). Ingrid Robeyns - Will basic income give justice to women ?, transl. M. Szlinder. Theoretical Practice, 10 February [Access: 15.03.2019]. Access on the Internet: http://www.praktykateoretyczna.pl/?s=Robeyns.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford.

Szwarc, A., Żarnowska, A. (2000). Równe prawa i nierówne szanse. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo DiG.

Titkow, A., Duch-Krzystoszek, D., Budrowska, B. (2004). Unpaid work of women. Myths, realities, perspectives. Warsaw: IFIS PAN.

Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz, A. (2010). Recovering citizenship. Macroeconomic analysis of the situation of women in Poland. Online Library of Think Tank Feminist 2010.

All texts published in the journal Humanities and Social Sciences are available in the full version on the website of HSS.

Open Access – CC BY 4.0

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons licence (CC-BY 4.0), including the following fields of exploitation comprising:

1) the right to publish the Work in print in book and digital form and to distribute it in book and digital form, including by displaying, playing, broadcasting, making it publicly available by the Publisher and third parties,

2) the right to record and reproduce all or part of the Work on paper and in the form of a digital record and in any other possible way by the Publisher,

3) the right to enter the Work into computer memory and save the Work in the IT systems of the Publisher and other entities distributing digital content,

4) the right to archive the Work and make copies of the Work on electronic media by the Publisher, without quantitative restrictions,

5) the right to digitise the Work and to perform conversions/transformations of the Work in electronic form into other digital formats by the Publisher and third parties,

6) the right to distribute the Work, including via the Internet or other ICT networks by the Publisher and other third parties, in a way that allows viewing, reading, copying the content of the Work in electronic form, i.e. all elements belonging to it, whereby copying shall be understood as the saving of the Work made available to an interested person on a medium of their choice,

7) the right to store the Work in the database of the Publisher and other entities distributing the Work in any form, as well as its processing in the database of the Publisher and third parties,

8) right to translate and publish the Work in one of the modern languages in any form by the Publisher and third parties.

The full text of the license is available at the following link: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en