TAXONOMIC ANALYSIS OF UNEMPLOYMENT IN EU COUNTRIES IN THE CONTEXT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Abstrakt

Unemployment is one of the most important problems affecting people in all countries. It affects the functioning of entire economies, industries, and enterprises; it also reduces the level and quality of people’s lives. The dynamic changes that are taking place in the labor market are forcing entrepreneurs to adopt a flexible approach to labor market resources – that is, employees – and also to choose appropriate forms of human capital management. This may lead to a reduction in unemployment in the market. Consequently, tackling unemployment is one of the important challenges facing the European Union, especially on its way to achieving sustainable development goals. High levels of unemployment could significantly hamper the achievement of the Agenda 2030 employment targets (SDG8), leading to poverty, social and economic inequality, and social instability. Therefore, the subject of this study is unemployment in EU countries; the main objective is to examine unemployment levels across EU member states. The deliberations and analysis are carried out in the context of the Agenda 2030 Goal 8 (SDG 8) for sustainable development. Taking into account the different degrees of implementation of SDG8 by individual Member States, and thus the different results in this respect, the study finds differences and similarities among the surveyed Member States in terms of types and levels of unemployment. The research is based on Eurostat data for 2022, and uses multidimensional comparative analysis methods such as cluster analysis and linear ordering. A review of selected sources on international and European law focuses on employment policy standards, including the problem of unemployment; this serves as a background for the analyses. The considerations are embedded in the concept of sustainable development, which influences the functioning of entire economies, but also in the processes of enterprise management. Based on the literature and the results of the analyses, it is concluded that levels of unemployment vary greatly in the analyzed countries. The best conditions for availability and accessibility of work are found in the Czech Republic and Malta; the worst are in Spain and Greece, where unemployment is very high.

https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2023.hss.60
pdf (English)

Bibliografia

Agenda 2030 na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju – implementacja w Polsce, http://www.un.org.pl/files/170/Agenda2030PL_pl-5.pdf.

Baran, K.W. (2019). System Prawa Pracy, Międzynarodowe publiczne prawo pracy. Standardy globalne, t. IX. Warszawa.

Cattell, R.A. (1944). Note on correlation clusters and cluster search methods. „Psychonometrica”, Vol 9.

Chudy-Laskowska, K., Pisula, T. (2022). An Analysis of the Use of Energy from Conventional Fossil Fuels and Green Renewable Energy in the Context of the European Union’s Planned Energy Transformation. “Energies”, Vol. 15. DOI: 10.3390/en15197369.

Commission (2005/193), Delivering on Growth and Jobs. A New Integrated Economic and Employment Co-ordination Cycle in the EU, SEC 2005/193. Access on the internet: https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/news/new-and-integrated-economic-and-employment-co-ordination-cycle-eu.

Council Resolution (1974) of 27 January 1974 concerning a social action programme, OJ C 013, 12.02. 1974.

Csillag, M., Scharle, Á. (2017). Analytical paper, Sustainable integration into the labour market, Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, Budapest Institute.

Davies, D.L., Bouldin, D.W., (1979). A cluster separation measure. „IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence”, PAMI-1, No. 2. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909.

ILO Declaration (2008) On social justice for fair globalization of June 10, 2008.

Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database.

Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/TESEM160/default/table?lang=en&category=es.tesem.

Eurostat, Which information can I find here?, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/youth.

Frątczak, E. (1993). Bezrobocie – wyzwanie dla polskiej gospodarki. Warszawa.

Gatnar, E., Walesiak, M. (2004). Metody statystycznej analizy wielowymiarowej w badaniach marketingowych. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu.

Goal 8: Promote inclusive and sustainable economic growth, employment and decent work for all. Access on the internet: https://unric.org/en/sdg-8/.

Gopal, K.K. (2006). 100 Statistical Test. SAGE Publications. London: Thousand Oaks, New Delhi.

Grabiński, T. (1992). Metody taksonometrii. Kraków: Wydawnictwo AE w Krakowie.

Grzybek, D. (2021). Pełne zatrudnienie – porzucona idea i jej odrodzenie. „Social Inequalities and Economic Growth”, No. 68(4/2021). DOI: 10.15584/nsawg.2021.4.1. Access on the internet: https://repozytorium.ur.edu.pl/items/7931ef26-3808-42ae-ac48-fdd85dc97829.

International Labour Office (2012), Geneva Organisation For Economic Co-Operation And Development, Paris, May. Access on the internet: https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/50318559.pdf.

International Labour Office (2023), World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2023, Geneva.

Jenkins, W. (2009). Berkshire encyclopaedia of sustainability: the spirit of sustainability, Vol. 1 (1sted.), Berkshire: Berkshire Publishing Group.

Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P. (2005). Finding groups in data. An introduction to cluster analysis, Series: Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley, Hoboken.

Klarin, T. (2018), The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues. “Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business” 21(1).

Kośmicki, E., Malinowska, S. (2015). Bezrobocie we współczesnym świecie. Czy istnieją możliwości pełnego zatrudnienia? Uniwersytet w Białymstoku, Optimum. „Studia Ekonomiczne”, nr 4(76). DOI: 10.15290/ose.2015.04.76.01.

Leogrande, A., (2023). The Employment Rate in Europe. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8008148.

Levasseur, A., Lesage, J., Margni, M., Deschênes, R., Samson, I., van der Werf, G.M.L.S. (2010). Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. “Environmental Science & Technology”, 44, No. 8(2010).

Lopez Ahumada, J.E. (2022), The promotion of decent work under Sustainable Development Goal N. 8. DOI: 10.19135/revista.consinter.00014.20.

López de Mántaras, R., Plaza, E. [eds.] (2000). Machine Learning: ECML 2000. ECML 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1810, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2000. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45164-1_8.

International Covenant (1966) on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Dz.U. 1977, nr 38, poz. 169.

Migdał-Najman, K. (2011), Ocena jakości wyników grupowania – przegląd bibliografii. „Przegląd Statystyczny”, t. 58, z. 3–4. Warszawa: PAN.

Młodak, A., (2011). Classification of multivariative objects using interval quantile classes. “Journal of Classification”, 28.

—— (2021). k-Means, Ward and Probabilistic Distance-Based Clustering Methods with Contiguity Constraint. “J Classif”, 38. DOI: 10.1007/s00357-020-09370-5

Pearce, W., Barbier, E., Markandya, A. (1990). Sustainable Development. Economics and the Environment in the Third World, Aldershot/Brookfield, p. 2.

Perło, D. (2014). Modelowanie zrównoważonego rozwoju regionów. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersyteckie Trans Humana.

Poskrobko, B. (2009). Zrównoważony rozwój gospodarki opartej na wiedzy. Białystok: Wydawnictwo WSE w Białymstoku.

Rousseeuw, P.J., (1987). Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. “Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics”, Vol. 20, No. 1.

Report 1987, of the World Commission on Environment and Development: note/by the Secretary-General. United Nations, Secretary-General; World Commission on Environment and Development, New York, 4 Aug. 1987. Access on the internet: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf.

Report WCED 1987 Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development, U.N. General Assembly, the Prime Minister of Norway, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Background paper (2012). Sustainable development, green growth and quality employment. Realizing the potential for mutually reinforcing policies, Background paper for the Meeting of G20 Labour and Employment Ministers, Guadalajara, 17–18 May 2012.

Świątkowski A.M. (1982). Polityka pełnego i racjonalnego zatrudnienia. „Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne”, No. 11–12.

—— (2016). Istota polityki społecznej – Urzędowa, planowa dystrybucja. „Horyzonty Polityki”, 2016/7/19.

Świątkowski, A.M., Wujczyk, M. (2011). Między elastycznością zatrudnienia a stabilnością socjalną. Idea flexsecurity na początku XXI wieku. „Praca i Zabezpieczenie Społeczne”, nr 5.

Tjahjanto, H., Tuhana, T., Mafruhah, I., Istiqomah, N., Ismoyowati, D. (2023). High unemployment, disrupted economic growth and sustainable development goals: Analyzing unemployment reduction. “Economics and Sociology”, 16(1). DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2023/16-1/7.

Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable Development, United Nations, https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.

Trends (2023). World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2023. Access on the internet:

https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---inst/documents/publication/wcms_865332.pdf.

Tryon, R.C. (1939). Cluster analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Ward, J.H. (1963). Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function. “Journal of the American Statistical Association”, 58. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845.

Wandzel, M. (2003), Równe traktowanie kobiet i mężczyzn. Kraków.

Wise, M., Gibb, R., (1993), Single market to social Europe. Harlow.