THE “WORK” OF ART: STANISŁAW BRZOZOWSKI AND BERNARD STIEGLER

Abstrakt

This article relates the ideas of Stanisław Brzozowski (1878–1911) with those of Bernard Stiegler (1952–2020), both of whom problematize the “work” of art understood as a labor practice. Through the conceptual analysis of epigenetics and epiphylogenetics for aesthetic theory, I claim that both thinkers develop practical concepts relevant to contemporary art philosophy. First, I present an overview of Brzozowski’s aesthetics, for whom literature and the arts are linked with ethics, and aesthetic form is tied with moral judgment. Then, I continue with an outline of Stiegler’s, for whom the role of artists is to sculpt a new culture and historical epoch called the Neganthropocene. Finally, the notion of “work” as a type of memory practice is analyzed. The comparison shows that Stiegler develops epigenetics phenomenologically via memory (“tertiary retentions”) and phylogenetics to epiphylogenetics. Both philosophers argue against determinism. This study suggests that their key ideas advance and complement each other.

https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2021.hss.22
pdf (English)

Bibliografia

Brzozowski, S. (1910a). Epigenetyczna teorya historyi [In:] Idee. Lwów: Księgarnia Polska B. Połonieckiego, p. 112–139.

—— (1910b). Materyalizm dziejowy jako filozofia kultury [In:] Idee. Lwów: Księgarnia Polska B. Połonieckiego, p. 1–13.

—— (2007). Głosy wśród nocy: Studya nad pozesileniem romantycznem kultury europejskiej (wyd. 2, krytyczne). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.

—— (2010). Wybór pism estetycznych (T. Szkołut, ed., wyd. 1). Kraków: Universitas.

Clark, A., Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. “Analysis”, 58(1). DOI: 10.1093/analys/58.1.7

Fitzpatrick, N. (2014). Symbolic Misery and Aesthetics – Bernard Stiegler. “Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics”, 6.

Hobsbawm, E. J. (2013). Jak zmienić świat: Marks i marksizm 1840–2011 (S. Szymański, Trans.). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.

Klaman, J. (2005). “Our Points Of View” in Stanisław Brzozowski’s “Epigenetic Theory of History.” Pamiętnik Literacki”, 96(3).

Le Brun, A. (2018). Ce qui n’a pas de prix: Beauté, laideur et politique. Stock.

Maienschein, J. (2017). Epigenesis and Preformationism [In:] Zalta, E. N., ed., The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Access on the internet: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/epigenesis/

Nicoglou, A., Wolfe, C. T. (2018). Introduction: Sketches of a conceptual history of epigenesis. “History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences”, 40(4), DOI: 10.1007/s40656-018-0230-1.

Serpentine Galleries. (2018, November 15). Work Marathon 2018: Bernard Stiegler - Too Late? The Final Warning. Access on the internet: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsGVN7UE0pw

Stiegler, B. (1998a). Technics and Time, 1. The Fault of Epimetheus (G. Collins & R. Beardsworth, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

—— (1998b). Technics and Time, 2. Disorientation (S. Barker, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

—— (2011). Technics and Time 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise (S. Barker, Trans.). Stanford University Press.

—— (2014a). Symbolic Misery, Vol. 1: The Hyperindustrial Epoch [In:] Symbolic Misery. Polity Press. DOI: 10.1353/con.2010.0011,

—— (2014b). The Re-Enchantment of the world: The value of spirit against Industrial Populism (T. Arthur, Trans.). Bloomsbury.

—— (2015). Symbolic Misery. Vol. 2. The Catastrophe of the Sensible. Polity Press.

—— (2017a). Kant, Art, and Time (S. Barker & A. De Boever, Trans.). “Boundary” 2, 44(1). DOI: 10.1215/01903659-3725845.

—— (2017b). The Proletarianization of Sensibility (A. De Boever, Trans.). “Boundary” 2, 44(1). DOI: 10.1215/01903659-3725833.

—— (2017c). The Quarrel of the Amateurs (R. Hughes, Trans.). “Boundary” 2, 44(1). DOI: 10.1215/01903659-3725857.

—— (2018). The Neganthropocene. Open Humanities Press.

—— (2019). The Age of Disruption: Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism. Polity Press.

Sugy, P. (2018, June 30). Annie Le Brun: «L’art contemporain, c’est l’enlaidissement du monde !». Le Figaro.fr. Access on the internet: https://www.lefigaro.fr/vox/culture/2018/06/30/31006-20180630ARTFIG00066-annie-le-brun-l-art-contemporain-c-est-lenlaidissement-du-monde.php

Szkołut, T. (2008). Estetyka Stanisława Brzozowskiego [In:] Wilkoszewska, K., ed., Wybór pism estetycznych. Kraków: Universitas. Velthuis, O., Coslor, E. (2012). The Financialization of Art. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199590162.013.0025.

Wojciszke, B. (2019). Psychologia społeczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Work Marathon | Serpentine Galleries (2018). Access on the internet: https://www.serpentinegalleries.org/exhibitions-events/work-marathon