Abstract
Approaches of size and accuracy analysis are relevant and universal for complex of ensure constructions at their assembly accuracy and interchangeability tasks decisions. Such approaches are usually based on dimensional chains (DC) theory apparatus, which is sufficiently developed, but, has a number of unsolved problems, such as polymer composites materials (PCM) geometrical parameters accuracy calculation. Difficulty arises applying above theory, both on DC formation and synthesis stage and on analysis and calculation subsequent stage. There is also a number of assumptions, which simplifies analysis of metallic constructions, but makes significant errors for PCM settlement.
This paper presents an analysis of formation and synthesis procedures for spatial DC (SDC) and all kinds of heterogeneous materials (including PCM), which showed unreasonableness of using “classical” methods and needs to clarify, on issue of taking into account PCM parts constructive-technological specifics parameters. Different approaches in composite constructions SDC model representation, among which the best approach has been defined, in which geometry of model is a structure of related coordinate systems of constructions parts. This approach allows to take into account the complex PCM structure as possible representation of their subsystems individual structures. Also take into account specific technological factors on PCM production stages and construction assembly stages.
Proposed approach involves the use of general structure model decomposition, which simplifies construction, and makes SDC model universal. Proposed method allows to build effective PCM structures models, designs to perform SDC formation and synthesis procedures, as well as further SDC analysis.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
References
Рудь В.Д., Герасимчук 0.0., Маркова т.п. Розмiрно-точносний аналiз конструкцiй та технологiй: Уч. пособие - Луцк: РИО ЛГТУ, 2008. - 344 с.
Исаев СВ. Модели геометрии машин в анализе точности 11 Компьютерная хроника. - 2000. - No 8. - с. 5-18.
Карепин П.А., Ерохин М.Н. Оценка уровня качества деталей и сборочных единиц сельскохозяй-ственной техники в процессе производства и ремонта. - М: МГАУ, 2002. -103 с.
S. С. Liu, S. J. Hu, and т. С. Woo Tolerance analysis for sheet metal аssеmЫiеs 11 ASME Journal of Mechanical Design. - 1996. - N!!. 118. - с. 62-67.
S. С. Liu and S. J. Hu Variation simulation for dеfогmаЫе sheet metal аssеmЫiеs using finite element methods 11 ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. - 1997. - N!!. 119. - с. 368-374.
Y. J. Long and S. J. Hu А unified model for variation simulation of sheet metal аssеmЫiеs 11 in Geometric Design Tolerancing: Theories, Standards and Applications, Н. А. EIMaraghy, Ed. Chapman & Hall. - 1998. - с. 208-219.
Карепин П.А. Обеспечение качества сельскохо-зяйственной техники при изготовлении и ремонте моделированием размерных связей в сборочных узлах: Автореферат дис. Д.Т.н. - М., 2002. - 491 с.
Исаев СВ. Формирование геометрической модели для моделирования погрешностей расположения поверхностей объекта производства 11 Компьютерная хроника. - 2000. - No 8. - С 19-34.
Byungwoo Lee, Mohammed М. Shalaby, Ronald J. Collins Variation Analysis of Three Dimensional non-rigid АssеmЫiеs 11 Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Symposium оп АssеmЫу and Manufacturing Апп Агbог, Michigan, USA, July 22-25, 2007.
К. G. Merkely, К. W. Chase, and Е. Реггу Ап introduction to tolerance analysis of flехiblе аssеmbiеs 11 Proceedings of the 1996 MSC World Users Conferences.
J. А. Camelio, S. J. Hu, and S. Р. Marin, "Compliant аssеmbу variation analysis using component geometric covariance 11 ASME Journal of Mechanical Design. - 2004. - No. 126/2. - с. 355-360.
R. Mantripragada and О. Е. Whitney The datum flow chain 11 Research in Engineering Design. - 1998. - N!!. 10. - с. 150-165.
O. Е. Whitney, R. Mantripragada, J. о. Adams, and S. J. Rhee Designing аssеmbliеs // Research in Engineering Design. - 1999. - No. 11. - с. 229-253.
O. Е. Whitney, Mechanical Аssеmbliеs: Their Design, Manufacture, and Role in Product Development, New York, Oxford University Press, 2004.
R. Mantripragada and о. Е. Whitney Modeling and controlling variation propagation in mechanical аssеmbliеs using state transition models // IEEE Transactions оп Robotics and Automation. - 1999. - No. 15/1. - с. 124-140.
J. Jin and J. Shi State space modeling of sheet metal аssеmblу for dimensional control// ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. - 1999. - N!!. 121/4. - с. 756-762.
У. Ding, о. Ceglarek, and J. Shi Modeling and diagnosis of multistage manufacturing processes: paгt 1: state space model // in Proceedings of the Japan/USA Symposium оп Flехibе Automation, Апп Arboг, MI, 2000.
Абибов А.л. Технология самолетостроения. (Изд. 2е). - М: Машиностроение, 1982. - 551 с.