ANALYSIS OF THE POSSIBILITY OF USING KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN THE SYSTEMS OF LOGISTICS AND PRODUCTION ENTERPRISES
pdf

Keywords

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs),
Quality Management
Efficiency

How to Cite

PACANA, A., Czerwińska, K., & Grebski, M. E. (2021). ANALYSIS OF THE POSSIBILITY OF USING KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN THE SYSTEMS OF LOGISTICS AND PRODUCTION ENTERPRISES. Modern Management Review, 26(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2021.mmr.04

Abstract

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are one of the most important management tools in enterprises. Their proper implementation and application help to improve and control both the processes and the effectiveness of activities undertaken in the organization. The study aimed to analyze the degree of use of the Key Performance Indicators in information technology (IT) systems by logistics companies and manufacturing companies and to investigate possible differences in the scope of knowledge and use of KPIs between logistics and manufacturing companies. The conducted analyses indicate that production companies tend to use financial and non-financial KPIs, while logistics companies mainly use financial indicators. Based on the pilot studies, the degree of use of KPIs was assessed as high. Respondents in the survey indicated a high or very high level of efficiency in the use of KPIs in the context of general objectives of enterprises from the perspective of customers, finances, processes, and development.

https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2021.mmr.04
pdf

References

Al-Mutairi S. H. (2012). Cost maintenance management, eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction. Proceedings of the European Conference on Product and Process Modelling.

Babica, M., Pająk, E. (2006). Koncepcja metody eliminacji niezgodności w procesach produkcyjnych. „Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej, Budowa Maszyn i Zarządzanie Produkcją”.

Bamford, D. R., Greatbanks, R. W. (2005). The use of quality management tools and techniques: a study of application in everyday situations. “International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management”.

Bartecki, K., Król, D., Skowroński, J. (2018). Wyznaczanie kluczowych wskaźników wydajności procesu produkcyjnego – część I: badania teoretyczne. „Pomiary. Automatyka. Robotyka”, R. 22, nr 3.

Berrah, L., Foulloy, L. (2013). Towards a unified descriptive framework for industrial objective declaration and performance measurement. “Computers in Industry”, 64.

Borsos, G., Iacob, CC., Calefariu, G. (2016), The use KPI's to determine the waste in production proces, 20th Innovative Manufacturing Engineering And Energy Conference (Imanee 2016), IOP Conference Series-Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 161.

Clifton, B. (2012). Advanced Web Metrics. Indianapolis: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Cobin, C. (2009). Creating effective performance measures, November 1.

Czerwińska, K., Pacana, A. (2020). Analysis of the exterior door production process using key performance indicators (KPI). „Zarządzanie Przedsiębiorstwem” / Polskie Towarzystwo Zarządzania Produkcją, 23, 1.

Czerwińska, K., Pacana, A., Dwornicka, R. (2020). Improvement of the production process with the use of selected KPIs. “System Safety: Human – Technical Facility – Environment”, Vol. 2, Issue 1.

Drucker, F. P. (2004). Zawód menedżer. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo MT Biznes.

Enns, B. (2005). Key performance indicators for new business development, Critical Briefings for the Business of Persuasion.

Grabowska, S. (2017). Kluczowe wskaźniki efektywności – studium przypadku. „Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Seria: Organizacja i Zarządzanie” z. 108, Politechnika Śląska.

Grudowski, P. (2006). Pomiary, analiza i doskonalenie jako kryteria auditu systemu zarządzania jakością. „Problemy Jakości”.

Grycuk, A. (2010). Kluczowe wskaźniki efektywności (KPI) jako narzędzie doskonalenia efektywności operacyjnej firm produkcyjnych zorientowanych na lean. „Przegląd Organizacji” nr 2.

Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2014). Znaczenie strategii proekologicznych w kontekście budowania przewagi konkurencyjnej przedsiębiorstw. „Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Zarządzanie Strategiczne w Teorii i Praktyce” nr 366.

Hollender, M., Chioua, M., Schlake, J., Merkert, L., Petersen, H. (2016). KPI-based Process Operation Management of highly automated processes, Institut für Regelungs- und Steuerungssysteme (IRS), ISSN: 0178-2320, 2190-4111, 2364-3137.

ISO 22400-1:2014 (2014). Automation systems and integration – Key performance indicators (KPIs) for manufacturing operations management. Part 1: Overview, concepts and terminology.

Kaganski, S., Paavel, M., Lavin, J. (2014). Selecting key performance indicators with support of enterprise analyze model. Proceedings of the International Conference of DAAAM Baltic “Industrial Engineering”.

Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.

Karaszewski, R. (2005). Zarządzanie jakością – koncepcje, metody, narzędzia stosowane przez liderów światowego biznesu. Toruń: TNOiK.

Melnyk S. A., Bititci U. S., Platts K., Tobias J., Anderson B. (2014). Is performance measurement and management fit for the future? “Management Accounting Research” 25(2).

Mentel, U., Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2020). Does standardization have an impact on innovation activity in different countries? “Problems and Perspectives in Management”, 18(4).

Mourtzis, D., Fotia, S., Vlachou, E., Koutoupes, A. (2018). A Lean PSS design and evaluation framework supported by KPI monitoring and context sensitivity tools. “The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology”, Vol. 94.

Neely, A., Adams, C., Kennerly, M. (2002). The Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Niemiec, A. (2019). Kluczowe mierniki dokonań (KPI) w zarządzaniu organizacją na gruncie teorii równowagi funkcjonalnej. Warszawa: CeDeWu.

Onyemeh, N. C., Lee, C. W., Iqbal, M. A. (2016). Key performance indicators for operational quality in the oil and gas industry a case study approach. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

Ortega, A. (2012). On the definition and Analysis of Process Performance Indicators. Sevilla: University of Sevilla.

Ostasz, G., Czerwińska, K., Pacana, A. (2020). Quality management of aluminum pistons with the use of quality control points. “Management Systems in Production Engineering”.

Pacana, A., Czerwińska, K. (2020), Kluczowe wskaźniki efektywności – KPI. „Management and Quality – Zarządzanie i Jakość”, Towarzystwo Naukowe Organizacji i Kierownictwa Oddział w Katowicach. Katowice: TNOiK.

Parmenter, D. (2016). Kluczowe wskaźniki efektywności (KPI). Tworzenie, wdrażanie i stosowanie. Gliwice: Helion.

Piasecka-Głuszak, A. (2017). Implementacja world class manufacturing w przedsiębiorstwie produkcyjnym na rynku polskim. „Ekonomia XXI Wieku” nr 4(16).

Podgórski, D. (2015). Measuring operational performance of OSH management system – A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. “Safety Science” No. 73.

Rolo, A., Pires, A. R., Saraiva, M. (2014). Supply chain as a collaborative virtual network based on larg strategy. “Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing”, 280.

Sudoł, S. (2006). Przedsiębiorstwo. Podstawy nauki o przedsiębiorstwie. Zarządzanie przedsiębiorstwem. Warszawa: PWE.

Vaser, M., Forconi, S. (2015). QoS KPI and QoE KQI Relationship for LTE Video Streaming and VoLTE Services, Proceedings – NGMAST 2015: The 9th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies.

Wolniak, R., Skotnicka, B. (2005). Metody i narzędzi zarządzania jakością. Teoria i praktyka. Gliwice: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej.

All texts published in the Journal "Modern Management Review" are available in the full version on the website of MMR. Digital IDs have also been entered from number 19 (3/2012) (DOI: 10.7862/rz.2018.mmr.1)

Open Access – CC BY 4.0

This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. The articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons licence (CC-BY 4.0), including the following fields of exploitation comprising:

1) the right to publish the Work in print in book and digital form and to distribute it in book and digital form, including by displaying, playing, broadcasting, making it publicly available by the Publisher and third parties,

2) the right to record and reproduce all or part of the Work on paper and in the form of a digital record and in any other possible way by the Publisher,

3) the right to enter the Work into computer memory and save the Work in the IT systems of the Publisher and other entities distributing digital content,

4) the right to archive the Work and make copies of the Work on electronic media by the Publisher, without quantitative restrictions,

5) the right to digitise the Work and to perform conversions/transformations of the Work in electronic form into other digital formats by the Publisher and third parties,

6) the right to distribute the Work, including via the Internet or other ICT networks by the Publisher and other third parties, in a way that allows viewing, reading, copying the content of the Work in electronic form, i.e. all elements belonging to it, whereby copying shall be understood as the saving of the Work made available to an interested person on a medium of their choice,

7) the right to store the Work in the database of the Publisher and other entities distributing the Work in any form, as well as its processing in the database of the Publisher and third parties,

8) right to translate and publish the Work in one of the modern languages in any form by the Publisher and third parties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.