PEER-REVIEW STATEMENT

PEER-REVIEW STATEMENT

The review principles of scientific articles in the Journal Modern Management Review

  1. To evaluate each article editors appoint two independent reviewers outside of the author’s institution. At least one of the reviewers is affiliated with a foreign institution other than the author's nationality.
  2. Editors choose the best-qualified reviewers in the field.
  3. Between the reviewers and authors of the article there is no conflict of interest.
  4. Reviewing procedure is done confidentially (double-blind peer review).
  5. Each review shall be in writing and ends with a request for approval or rejection of the article for publication.
  6. Reviews that do not meet the substantive and procedural requirements are not accepted.
  7. Pre-qualified by the editor-in-chief paper is sent to reviewers who comment on its acceptance or rejection. Reviewers are entitled to re-examine the revised text.
  8. Reviewers’ remarks are transmitted to the author whose duty is to correct the text.
  9. The final decision to qualify or reject the article belongs to the editor-in-chief in consultation with the members of the Editorial Board.
  10. Review form is available here. Eligibility or rejection criteria are included in the review form.
  11. The names of the cooperative reviewers will be quoted once a year - in the last issue of the Papers, and published on the website.
  12. Each reviewer and reviewer submits the reviewer's declaration of no conflict of interest. The reviewer is obliged to inform the editorial office of the journal about the occurrence of a conflict of interest.
  13. The review helps the editor make editorial decisions and, through the editor's communication with the author, is also intended to help the author improve the article.
  14. Reviewers are required to disclose any plagiarism, omissions, data manipulation, and should pay attention to providing sources and the validity of the cited legal provisions.
  15. When assessing the article, reviewers emphasize the reliability of the content as well as the originality and usefulness of the texts for science.