TOPIC MODELING: THE USE OF MACHINE LEARNING AND REFERENCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN THE AREA OF INTERNATIONALIZATION OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES (SMES)
pdf

Keywords

SMEs
MALLET
Endnote
Survey Literature
Internationalization

How to Cite

Gonzalez Flores, O. (2022). TOPIC MODELING: THE USE OF MACHINE LEARNING AND REFERENCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN THE AREA OF INTERNATIONALIZATION OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES (SMES). Modern Management Review, 27(4), 7-17. https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2022.mmr.18

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to find new trends in the literature using machine learning and reference management systems within the theme of the Internationalization of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). With help of topic modeling software 857 articles on the topic "Internationalization of SMEs from 2012 to 2021 were analyzed and ranked (citation index) through Endnote® library management systems. The search was focused only on the fields of social science and management. 85 documents were shortlisted from the original cluster to proceed with the text mining. Results show promising areas of research within the Internationalization of SMEs. Stand-out topics include Resource-based Theory, Dynamics Capabilities, International Entrepreneurship, and Ambidexterity among others.

Endnote® Subject Bibliography found the most popular words and topics in the original database. Results showed that using Endnote® and MALLET topic modeling tool it is possible to analyze large amounts of publications and find new trends within a specific field. However, MALLET software needs experts in the field to identify and translate results into meaningful ideas. Endnote® seems to have a higher level of sophistication and a better visual interface, but among the disadvantages are the price of the tool and that it works better with their libraries or partner journals.

https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2022.mmr.18
pdf

References

Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476-494. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016

Ács, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2007). The Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEINDEX). Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 5(5), 341-435. doi:10.1561/0300000027

Analytics, C. (2021). Web of Science (Version X9.1).

Bai, W. S., Holmstrom-Lind, C., & Johanson, M. (2018). Leveraging networks, capabilities and opportunities for international success: A study on returnee entrepreneurial ventures. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(1), 51-62. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2017.12.001

Banno, M., Piscitello, L., & Varum, C. (2015). Determinants of the Internationalization of Regions: The Role and Effectiveness of Public Policy Measures. Regional Studies, 49(7), 1208-1222. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.821570

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Suastained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. doi:10.1177/014920639101700108

Block, S. (2006). Doing More with Digitization. Commonplace: the journal of early American life, January. Retrieved from http://commonplace.online/article/doing-more-with-digitization/

Boehe, D., & Jimenez, A. (2018). Does the sequencing of related and unrelated export diversification matter? Evidence from Colombian exporters. International Business Review, 27(6), 1141-1149. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.04.005

Carpenter, J. (2012). Researchers of Tomorrow: The research behaviour of Generation Y doctoral students. Information Services & Use, 32(1-2), 3-17.

Chung, H. F. L., Ding, Z. J., & Ma, X. F. (2019). Organisational learning and export performance of emerging market entrepreneurial firms The roles of RBV mechanism and decision-making approach. European Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 257-278. doi:10.1108/ejm-08-2017-0496

Covin, J. G., & Miller, D. (2014). International Entrepreneurial Orientation: Conceptual Considerations, Research Themes, Measurement Issues, and Future Research Directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 11-44. doi:10.1111/etap.12027

Dow, D., Liesch, P., & Welch, L. (2018). Inertia and Managerial Intentionality: Extending the Uppsala Model. Management International Review, 58(3), 465-493. doi:10.1007/s11575-017-0340-0

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::Aid-smj133>3.0.Co;2-e

Enderle, S. (2017, 2017-01-06). Quickstart Guide. Topic Modeling tool. Retrieved from /topic-modeling-tool/documentation/2017/01/06/quickstart.html

Gotschall, T. (2021). EndNote 20 desktop version. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(3), 520. doi:10.5195/jmla.2021.1260

Gulanowski, D., Papadopoulos, N., & Plante, L. (2018). The role of knowledge in international expansion: Toward an integration of competing models of internationalization. Review of International Business and Strategy, 28(1), 35-60. doi:10.1108/Ribs-09-2017-0077

Gupta, S., Malhotra, N. K., Czinkota, M., & Foroudi, P. (2016). Marketing innovation: A consequence of competitiveness. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5671-5681. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.042

Hui, L. C., & Leong, Y. C. (2016). Critical Success Factors of Food and Beverages Manufacturing Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Case Study Approach.

Jimenez, A., & Boehe, D. (2018). How do political and market exposure nurture ambidexterity? Journal of Business Research, 89, 67-76. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.016

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). Internationalization process firm - Model of Knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676

Kahiya, E. T. (2018). Five decades of research on export barriers: Review and future directions. International Business Review, 27(6), 1172-1188. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.04.008

Kim, H. J. (2018). Reconciling Entrepreneurial Orientation and Dynamic Capabilities: A Strategic Entrepreneurship Perspective. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 27(2), 180-208. doi:10.1177/0971355718781252

Kiss, A. N., Fernhaber, S., & McDougall-Covin, P. P. (2017). Slack, Innovation, and Export Intensity: Implications for Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. doi:10.1111/etap.12276

Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124-141. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400071

Li, F., & Ding, D. Z. (2013). The effect of institutional isomorphic pressure on the internationalization of firms in an emerging economy: evidence from China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 19(4), 506-525. doi:10.1080/13602381.2013.807602

Lopez, A. M., & Torres, J. E. (2017). The international expansion of a firm: Experience of a SME in the technological sector of Argentina. Estudios Gerenciales, 33(144), 240-249. doi:10.1016/j.estger.2017.08.001

March, J. G. (1991). Exploitation and Exploration in Organizational Learning Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

McCallum, A. (2002). MALLET: Machine Learning for Language Toolkit. Retrieved from http://mallet.cs.umass.edu

Meeks, E., & Weingart, S. B. (2012). The digital humanities contribution to topic modeling. Journal of Digital Humanities, 2(1), 1-6.

Nguyen, H. T. X., & Le, V. (2019). Network ties and export propensity of Vietnamese small and medium enterprises. Asia Pacific Business Review, 25(1), 100-122. doi:10.1080/13602381.2018.1531615

O'Reilly 3rd, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74.

Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. (2005). Defining International Entrepreneurship and Modeling the Speed of Internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 537-553.

Qiang, J., Qian, Z., Li, Y., Yuan, Y., & Wu, X. (2020). Short text topic modeling techniques, applications, and performance: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

Qiao, P., Fung, H.-G., & Ju, X. (2013). Effects of Social Capital, Top Executive Attributes and R&D on Firm Value in Chinese Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. China & World Economy, 21(4), 79-100. doi:10.1111/j.1749-124X.2013.12029.x

Santos-Arteaga, F. J., Torrecillas, C., & Tavana, M. (2019). Dynamic effects of learning on the innovative outputs and productivity in Spanish multinational enterprises. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(1), 97-131. doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9597-5

Surdu, I., & Mellahi, K. (2016). Theoretical foundations of equity based foreign market entry decisions: A review of the literature and recommendations for future research. International Business Review, 25(5), 1169-1184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.03.001

Szerb, L., & Ulbert, J. (2009). The Examination of the Competitiveness in the Hungarian SME Sector: A Firm Level Analysis. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 6(3), 105-123. Retrieved from ://WOS:000273405800007

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. doi:10.1002/smj.640

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. doi:Doi 10.1002/(Sici)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::Aid-Smj882>3.0.Co;2-Z

Vahlne, J. E., & Jonsson, A. (2017). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability in the globalization of the multinational business enterprise (MBE): Case studies of AB Volvo and IKEA. International Business Review, 26(1), 57-70. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.006

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. doi:DOI 10.1002/smj.4250050207

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Modern Management Review

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.