Keywords
5Why method
quality management tools
improving of product
production engineering
mechanical engineering
How to Cite
Abstract
Identification of causes of incompatibilities of the products treated with the powder method allows their elimination or minimization of those differences, which contributes to the improvement of the powder coating method and thus to the development of processes in the field of metallurgy. The aim of the article is to analyze the corrosion problem on the ventilator cover with the use of the sequence of selected quality management instruments (Ishikawa diagram and the 5Why method) and proposed actions to eliminate or minimize the problem and improve the powder coating process and organization within the workplace place of the selected company. The analysis was carried out at the request of the management of the Podkarpackie fan producer. The management wanted to analyze some of a problems in the simple and cheaper way, and thus in the enterprise this using the types of the method was not practiced. The management were wanted to analyze the problem with using these types of method because, in this enterprise, this was not practiced yet. The analysis of corrosion using the new sequence – Ishikawa diagram and 5Why method allowed, i.e.: appropriate analysis of the problem, identified the root cause of adequate problem and proposed the actions for the problem, thanks to which is possible to improve the powder coating process and a good organization workplace in the selected company. The sequence used and the proposed improvement actions can be used to analyze quality problems in other production and service companies.
References
Adams J.D. (1989), Powder coating, the dry paint. PLATING AND SURFACE FINISHING, 76(6), 40-41.
Benjamin, S. et al. (2015), The use of 5-WHYs technique to eliminate OEE's speed loss in a manufacturing firm. Journal Of Quality In Maintenance Engineering, 21(4), 419-420. doi: 10.1108/JQME-09-2013-0062.
Bilsel R.U., Lin D.K.J. (2012), Ishikawa Cause and Effect Diagrams Using Capture Recapture Techniques. Quality Technology And Quantitative Management, 9(2), 137-152. doi: 10.1080/16843703.2012.11673282.
Boer J., Petruta B. (2014), The "Edge Effect" In Measuring The Thickness Of Powder Paint. 8th International Conference on Interdisciplinarity in Engineering (Inter-Eng), Tirgu Mures, Romania.
Braglia M., Frosolini M., Gallo M. (2017), SMED enhanced with 5-Whys Analysis to improve set-upreduction programs: the SWAN approach. International Journal Of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90(5-8), 1845-1855. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9477-4.
Chokkalingam B., et al. (2017), Investigation of Shrinkage Defect in Castings by Quantitative Ishikawa Diagram. ARCHIVES OF FOUNDRY ENGINEERING, 17(1), 174-178. doi: 10.1515/afe-2017-0032.
Donelli P., Picoltrini B., Donelli L. (2012), How coatings contribute to energy saving and environmental preservation while protecting from corrosion. Metallurgia Italiana, 1(2), 5-12.
John B. (2015), A dual response Surface optimization methodology for achieving unigorm coating thickness in powder coating process. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 6(4), 469-480.
Kramer H. (1993), Safety Aspects Of Electrostatic Paint, Powder And Flock Spraying Processes. 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONF ON ELECTROSTATICS, Lahnstein, Germany.
Lira H. et al. (2017), Use of the Ishikawa diagram in a case-control analysis to assess the causes of a diffuse lamellar keratitis outbreak. Arquivos Brasileiros De Oftalmologia, 80(5), 281-284.
Mozaryn T. (2018), I want to have it - how to obtain and maintain quality label qualicoat for powder paints. OCHRONA PRZED KOROZJA, 61(3), 75-77.
Naderi R., Attar M. M., Moayed M. H. (2004), EIS examination of mill scale on mild steel with polyester–epoxy powder coating. Progress in Organic Coatings, 50(3), 162-165.
Ostasz G., Siwiec D., Pacana A. (2022), Universal Model to Predict Expected Direction of Products Quality Improvement. ENERGIES, 15, 1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15051751
Pacana A., Siwiec D., Bednarova L. (2019), Analysis of the incompatibility of the product with fluorescent method. METALURGIJA, 58, 3-4, pp. 337-340.
Pacana, A., Siwiec, D. (2021), Universal Model to Support the Quality Improvement of Industrial Products. MATERIALS, 14, 7872. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247872
Pacana, A., Siwiec, D. (2022), Model to Predict Quality of Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations. ENERGIES, 15, 1101. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15031101
Pardo, N.S., Aristizabal, R.E. (2017), Failure analysis of extruder screw bushings used to process powder paint. MATERIA-RIO DE JANEIRO, 22(2). doi: 10.1590/S1517-707620170002.0138.
Rustico Z. et al. (2015), Manpower utilization in the powder coating production of a powder coating company. 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE), Las Vegas, NV.
Salvador, C.G., Goldfarb, N. (2004), Ishikawa cause and effect diagrams: A useful tool in designing economic analyses. VALUE IN HEALTH, 7(3), 301-302.
Shin D.G., Lee S.I., Son K.S. (2015), Countermeasure for construction machinery produced using 5WHY technique. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 7(4), 1478-1484.
Siwiec D., Grebski M.E. (2022), Method Of Processing Customers' Expectations To Improve The Quality Of Products. Modern Management Review, 27(3), 49-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2022.mmr.16
Siwiec D., Pacana A. (2021), A Pro-Environmental Method of Sample Size Determination to Predict the Quality Level of Products Considering Current Customers’ Expectations. SUSTAINABILITY, 13, 5542. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105542
Siwiec D., Pacana A. (2021), Model of Choice Photovoltaic Panels Considering Customers’ Expectations. ENERGIES, 14, 5977. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185977
Siwiec D., Pacana A. (2022), A New Model Supporting Stability Quality of Materials and Industrial Products. MATERIALS, 15, 4440. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134440
Wade L. (2002), Problems with powder-coat paint toys and zinc exposure in large parrots. Journal Of Avian Medicine And Surgery, 16(2), 99-100. https://doi.org/10.1647/1082-6742(2002)016[0099:PWPCPT]2.0.CO;2
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Modern Management Review