Keywords
industrial competitiveness
innovation
industry 4.0
SMEs
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to find a relationship between the organizational architecture and technological architecture for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMES) in Tehuacán city, which is a medium size town at southeast of México city, according to two aspects, the first is to know how much the businessmen are educated to apply tactics for industry 4.0 on order to gain competitiveness, based in their perceptions; and the second is, what have they done to make some implementation in their facilities to reach better productivity. The methodology used in this work is a survey for 574 business, through a questionnaire with answer options in Likert scale. The results exhibit that there is high knowledge about the industry 4.0, and the most of the firms which are made implementations are related to Trade, Manufacturing, Construction and Restaurants. This works a good view on the practices for make modern business in a medium size town.
References
Aguilar, Ó.C., Chuc, F. de A., Peña, N.B., Posada, R. (2021). Las Mypes de Latinoamérica ante la Pandemia del Covid (1a ed.). iQuatro Editores.
Bricley, J., Smith, C., Zimmerman, J. (2005). Economía empresarial y Arquitectura Organizacional. M. Graw-Hill, Ed., 3a ed.
Buenrostro Mercado, H.E. (2022). Propuesta de adopción de tecnologías asociadas a la industria 4.0 en las pymes mexicanas. “Entreciencias: Diálogos en la Sociedad del Conocimiento”, 10(24). DOI: 10.22201/enesl.20078064e.2022.24.81347.
Carrillo, J., Gomis, R., De los Santos, S. (2020). ¿Podrán transitar los ingenieros a la Industria 4.0? “Análisis industrial en Baja California”. DOI: 10.22201/enesl.20078064e.2020.22.76089e22.76089.
Figueroa-López, A., García de la Torre, C. (2018). Un modelo para la toma de decisiones sustentables en las organizaciones. “Investigación Administrativa”, 48(122). Access on the internet: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=456055708001.
Foladori, G., Ortiz-Espinoza, A. (2022). The capital-labor relationship in Industry 4.0. “Iconos”, 26(73). DOI: /10.17141/iconos.73.2022.5198.
Gobierno del Estado de Puebla (2019). Tehuacán. Access on the internet: https://planeader.puebla.gob.mx/pdf/ProgramasRegionales2020/0_ProRegionales13 Tehuacán.pdf.
Gutarra Romero, R.J., Valente Mercado, A.G. (2018). Las Mipymes tecnológicas peruanas al 2030. Estrategias para su inserción a la industria 4.0. “Nova Scientia”, 10(20). DOI: 10.21640/ns.v10i20.1329.
INEGI. (2020). DENUE. Access on the internet: https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/mapa/denue/.
Junior, A.A.B., Carrer, M.J. (2022). Adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies: an analysis of small and medium-sized companies in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. “Gestao e Producao”, 29. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9649-2022V29E122.
Llanes, M., Salvador, Y., Suárez, M.Á., Morejón, M.M. (2023). De procesos del negocio a procesos inteligentes en la industria 4.0. 29(1). Access on the internet: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=181574471003.
Ortiz Clavijo, L.F., Fernández Ledesma, J.D., Cadavid Nieto, S., Gallego Duque, C.J. (2018). Computación en la Nube: Estudio de herramientas orientadas a la Industria 4.0. “Lámpsakos”, 20. DOI: 10.21501/21454086.2560.
Ynzunza, C.B., Izar, J.M., Bocarando, G.J., Aguilar, F., Larios, M. (2017). El Entorno de la Industria 4.0: Implicaciones y Perspectivas Futuras. Access on the internet: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=94454631006.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Modern Management Review